Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 10/12] enic: Avoid false positive under FORTIFY_SOURCE

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:03:35PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! From: Kees Cook [ Upstream commit 40b9385dd8e6a0515e1c9cd06a277483556b7286 ] FORTIFY_SOURCE has been ignoring 0-sized destinations while the kernel code base has been converted to flexible arrays. In order to enforce the 0-siz

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 10/12] enic: Avoid false positive under FORTIFY_SOURCE

Hi! > From: Kees Cook > > [ Upstream commit 40b9385dd8e6a0515e1c9cd06a277483556b7286 ] > > FORTIFY_SOURCE has been ignoring 0-sized destinations while the kernel > code base has been converted to flexible arrays. In order to enforce > the 0-sized destinations (e.g. with __counted_by), the remai

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 10/12] enic: Avoid false positive under FORTIFY_SOURCE

From: Kees Cook [ Upstream commit 40b9385dd8e6a0515e1c9cd06a277483556b7286 ] FORTIFY_SOURCE has been ignoring 0-sized destinations while the kernel code base has been converted to flexible arrays. In order to enforce the 0-sized destinations (e.g. with __counted_by), the remaining 0-sized destin