On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 06/10/2023 22:28, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:49:52 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> >> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __coun
On 06/10/2023 22:28, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:49:52 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
>> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
>> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:49:52 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On 9/22/23 11:49, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIF
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
