Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg*

2024-07-07 Thread Zhang, Rui
Hi, Peter, On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 11:24 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:18:30AM +, Zhang, Rui wrote: > > > > > > I have a doubt about this, won't the future Intel multi-die > > > > > systems > > > > > have die-scope for the RAPL PMU like Casecadelake-AP? > > > > > >

[PATCH v6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939-longcheer-l9100: Add rear flash

2024-07-07 Thread André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
From: André Apitzsch The phone has a Silergy SY7802 flash LED controller. Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio Signed-off-by: André Apitzsch --- This series introduces a driver for the Silergy SY7802 charge pump used in the BQ Aquaris M5 and X5 smartphones. The implementation is based on information ex

Re: [PROBLEM linux-next] include/linux/fortify-string.h:580:25: error: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field

2024-07-07 Thread Kees Cook
On July 6, 2024 5:26:25 PM PDT, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: >Hi, all! > >This is the result of testing randconfig with KCONFIG_SEED=0xEE7AB52F in >next-20240703 vanilla tree on >Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. GCC used is gcc (Ubuntu 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 12.3.0. > >The particular error is as follows: > >In fi

Re: [PATCH] Revert "bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()" for linux-6.6.37

2024-07-07 Thread WangYuli
On 2024/7/6 17:30, Greg KH wrote: This makes it sound like you are reverting this because of a build error, which is not the case here, right? Isn't this because of the powerpc issue reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240705203413.wbv2nw3747vje...@altlinux.org ? No, it only o