[PATCH] Revert "bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()" for linux-6.6.37

2024-07-05 Thread WangYuli
This reverts commit 08f6c05feb1db21653e98ca84ea04ca032d014c7. Upstream commit e60adf513275 ("bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()") depends on upstream commit 1dad391daef1 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management"). It will cause a compi

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] USB: serial: garmin_gps: annotate struct garmin_packet with __counted_by

2024-07-05 Thread Johan Hovold
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:42:43PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > The size is assigned before the first reference to the flexible array > (see pkt_add()), which allows for a straightforward annotation without > further modifications. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco > --- > Changes in v2: > -

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg*

2024-07-05 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:18:30AM +, Zhang, Rui wrote: > > > > I have a doubt about this, won't the future Intel multi-die > > > > systems > > > > have die-scope for the RAPL PMU like Casecadelake-AP? > > > > > > For future multi-die systems that I know, the RAPL is still package > > > scop