Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Leon Romanovsky :
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:28:39 -0700 you wrote:
> Allow variable size indirection table allocation in MANA instead
> of using a constant value MANA_INDIRECT_TABLE_SIZE.
> The size is now derived from the MANA_QUERY_VPO
Le 12/06/2024 à 23:01, André Apitzsch via B4 Relay a écrit :
From: André Apitzsch
The SY7802 is a current-regulated charge pump which can regulate two
current levels for Flash and Torch modes.
It is a high-current synchronous boost converter with 2-channel high
side current sources. Each chann
On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 23:09:26 +0530, Odelu Kukatla wrote:
> Add clock property to enable the clocks required for accessing
> QoS configuration registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Odelu Kukatla
> ---
> .../interconnect/qcom,sc7280-rpmh.yaml| 53 +++
> 1 file changed, 53 inserti
On June 13, 2024 7:06:47 AM PDT, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 15:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:48 +0200
>> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I've added one more comment to v5, with that fixed I can take this.
>> > >
>> >
>> > So how is this suppo
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:06:47 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Fair enough. As long as it is documented that there is no guarantee
> that this will keep working over a kernel upgrade, then I have no
> objections.
Thanks,
I'll send out v6 and even stress that this may not work for all kernel
version
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 15:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:48 +0200
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >
> > > I've added one more comment to v5, with that fixed I can take this.
> > >
> >
> > So how is this supposed to work wrt to the rigid 'no user visible
> > regressions' rule,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:00:31 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > + /* Make sure the name is not already used (size is only updated if
> > found) */
> > + if (reserve_mem_find_by_name(name, &start, &size))
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> I'd prefer another variable here rather than size. Wil
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:48 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > I've added one more comment to v5, with that fixed I can take this.
> >
>
> So how is this supposed to work wrt to the rigid 'no user visible
> regressions' rule, given that this whole thing is a best effort thing
This has nothin
