On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:59:37PM -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
> Coverity from a scan of next-20240213 as part of the linux-next scan project:
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-s
Hello!
This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
Coverity from a scan of next-20240213 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan
You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lin
v2:
- don't add a new helper, just add __VA_ARGS__ (Rasmus)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240210011452.work.985-k...@kernel.org/
Hi,
We're going to have more cases where we need to apply attributes
(e.g. __counted_by) to struct members that have been declared with
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY. Add an
The size of the imsf_slist_flex member is determined by imsf_numsrc, so
annotate it as such.
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Paolo Abeni
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Signed-off-by: Kees Co
With the coming support for the __counted_by struct member attribute,
we will need a way to add such annotations to the places where
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() is used. Add an optional 3rd argument that can be
used for including attributes in the flexible array definition.
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes
Cc: Dan
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:22:00AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 10/02/2024 02.16, Kees Cook wrote:
> > With the coming support for the __counted_by struct member attribute, we
> > will need a way to add such annotations to the places where
> > DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() is used. Introduce DECLARE_
The check_*_overflow() helpers will return results with potentially
wrapped-around values. These values have always been checked by the
selftests, so avoid the confusing language in the kern-doc. The idea of
"safe for use" was relative to the expectation of whether or not the
caller wants a wrapped
Provide helpers that will perform wrapping addition, subtraction, or
multiplication without tripping the arithmetic wrap-around sanitizers. The
first argument is the type under which the wrap-around should happen
with. In other words, these two calls will get very different results:
wrappi
v6: rename wrapping_inc/dec to wraping_assign_add/sub (andy)
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240207152317.do.560-k...@kernel.org/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240206102354.make.081-k...@kernel.org/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240205090854.make.507-k...@kernel.org/
v2: https://lore.kern
This allows replacements of the idioms "var += offset" and "var -=
offset" with the wrapping_assign_add() and wrapping_assign_sub() helpers
respectively. They will avoid wrap-around sanitizer instrumentation.
Add to the selftests to validate behavior and lack of side-effects.
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:10:08 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> DTS for the phone and some fly-by fixes
>
> Patch 1 for Mark/sound
> Rest for qcom
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/7] dt-bindings: ASoC: cs35l45: Add interrupts
We are trying to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions to prevent integer overflows[1]. Here the multiplication is
obviously safe, but using kcalloc() is more appropriate and improves
readability. This patch has no effect on runtime behavior.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/
12 matches
Mail list logo
