Hello,
I don't know whether the current ocf:Filesystem supports EXT4? Does
anyone who knows of this, please advice?
Many thanks,
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://l
Looks like it just tries to mount whatever you put in there:
case "$FSTYPE" in
none) $MOUNT $options $DEVICE $MOUNTPOINT &&
bind_mount
;;
"") $MOUNT $options $DEVICE $MOUNTPOINT ;;
*) $MOUNT -t $FSTYPE $options $DEVICE $MOUNTPOINT ;;
I have filed a bug report about this issue:
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2242
On Monday 07 December 2009 06:18:13 Marian Marinov wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm just setting up a new HA solution and decided to go with the latest
> peacemaker. However I have encountered some ve
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Alexander Födisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a very strange problem. On a cluster of three nodes we can start one
> of the resources only on one node, but on
> the other both nodes the start always fails:
>
>
> Dec 05 09:40:14 lrmd: [4097]: WARN: on_msg_get_metadat
Jochen Lienhard [03.12.2009 09:10]:
> Hi Tim,
>
> do special reasons exist for using SLE HA?
In SLES 10, all HA software was within the normal support. In SLES 11,
the HA packages are supported with a special support contract.
> Are there some problems with linux-ha and SLES 11?
Should not be t
Hi Phil Bayfiled,
We are not un-mount the nfs because i believe heartbeat is take care to
start and stop the nfs service. For testing the failover, we stop the
heartbeat at primary node, but secondary node is not able to take the
resource and we are getting the below error :
Filesystem[7192]:
Hi,
Apologies for my previous mail, I should have been clearer. I've got a
full hb_report now (attached or at
http://dx.infernix.net/xen_order.tar.bz2). I'll keep things short and to
the point.
I've got a two node heartbeat+pacemaker cluster, using DRBD for shared
storage. I have 7 ocf:hear
