Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:35:35PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Lars,
>>
>> you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is
>> slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need
>> the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:35:35PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Lars,
>
> you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is
> slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need
> the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to "load", you could get it a
On Friday 04 February 2011 14:35:35 Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Lars,
>
> you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is
> slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need
> the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to "load", you could get it a lot
> fa
Lars,
you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is slow
in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need the CPU
usage at all. If you'd switch to "load", you could get it a lot faster.
To be honest: I wondered what "HealthCPU" would monitor abo
>>> "Soffen, Matthew" schrieb am 03.02.2011 um 16:35 in
Nachricht :
> Morning All,
>
> Please also keep in mind that /proc/stat is ONLY in Linux and Linux-HA
> despite the name is also used on FreeBSD and Solaris.
Hi!
Good thought: I was wondering whether the output format on other systems
ma
On Thursday 03 February 2011 16:00:54 Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Michael Schwartzkopff schrieb am 03.02.2011 um
> >>> 13:09 in
>
> Nachricht <201102031309.04931.mi...@clusterbau.com>:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2011 12:35:34 Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm starting to explore Linux
>>> Michael Schwartzkopff schrieb am 03.02.2011 um 13:09
>>> in
Nachricht <201102031309.04931.mi...@clusterbau.com>:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011 12:35:34 Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm starting to explore Linux-HA. Examining one of the monitors, I think
> > things could be made much