Hi Ken,
* Am Wed, Jul 10 at 15:05:10 -0500 , schrieb Ken Hahn:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get FAI working for an install of several labs using
> Debian Wheezy. I'm using the latest wheezy install of FAI (which is
> version 4.0.6).
>
> My install process has worked fine when I empty out the disk
Hi,
I think the patch posted in this bug report will fix the problem with lvm,
haven't tested it yet. Notice there are two bugs in that report but the one you
want is the one posted on github.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676882
https://github.com/kumy/fai/commit/fbdde8f670
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:51:16 -0400, n43w79 said:
> Trying to install fai-server 4.0.6 and apt-get or aptitude shall install
the following (quote):
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>debconf-utils{a} debootstrap{a} fai-client{a} fai-server file{a}
>isc-
You can also leave the package installed, but disable starting it after
reboot:
insserv -r isc-dhcp-server
I have chosen this route myself. In order not to forget, you can have a
configuration tool (eg cfengine) check the status of the package and
re-run the above command in cases where package u
I can confirm that disks with LVM can not be cleanly re-installed with
FAI 4.0.6. A wipefs command fails, causing the whole setup-storage to
fail.
We have only a couple of such systems, all with LVM on top of RAID1, and
for these, I have a hook to task partition with the following content:
vgremo
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:51:16PM -0400, n43w79 wrote:
> Q. Is there a way NOT to install isc-dhcp-server as I already have dnsmasq on
> our network.
Install it, but leave it unconfigured if there's a dnsmasq running somewhere
else?
S
Install it, but leave it unconfigured if there's a dnsmasq running
somewhere else?
Thank you all for replying! I am trying to reduce the size of the install on
disk. A base install so far had taken up 700MB!
Hello,
Thanks, indeed that patch fixed the problem and made sense to me. I am
still, however, curious if there is indeed any documentation on the
various pre and post states, just so I can understand what they are
supposed to mean? The new vg_enabled_for_destroy_* makes sense to me,
but I'm curi
Hello,
It looks like this fix doesn't resolve the problem when a preserved
partition is desired. Still looking into it.
-Ken
On 07/11/2013 11:40 AM, Ken Hahn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks, indeed that patch fixed the problem and made sense to me. I am
> still, however, curious if there is indeed
Hello,
I've been looking through the code, and perhaps I need to ask this on
the dev list, but I can never see a reason that we need to call vgchange
-a n. It appears to just cause problems.
Am I correct about this? Can I get a scenario where it would be
required? perhaps resize... I'm not sure
10 matches
Mail list logo
