On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Let me postpone the /boot problem for a second; for the more generic encoding
> of
> "partition 2 of disk1" please use the syntax disk1.2 (and disk1.3, disk1.4,
OK, thanks.
> Thanks a lot for sending the debug output, that was pretty helpful
Yeah
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:57:08 +0100, Manuel Hachtkemper
> said:
> and we want to preserve /local. So I would assume replacing X with 7, but
this is mistake, because /local becomes /dev/sda3 in the installation (and sda7
is preserved).
Yes, we need a better description in setup-sto
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:12:43 +0100, Martin Konrad
> said:
> I ran into the following problem by just trying to upgrade one of the FAI
> packages on my FAI server from 3.4.4 to 3.4.5:
> --
> # aptitude upgrade fai-doc
> The following packages will be upgrade
Le samedi 04 décembre 2010 à 12:42 +0100, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> Do you think you could convince your users to send the logs right
> after the
> first failure? I'm still not sure I completely understand why this
> problem
> occurs, and in particular what the correct solution would be.
Oka
Hi,
A few times ago, we've improve setup-storage so LVM and RAID arrays
could refer to diskX to use entire disk.
I've found in the changelogs that it has been integrated in
setup-storage 1.1.2 ; fai (3.3) ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009
"changelog : setup-storage/Parser.pm: LVM volume groups or RAID arrays
m
Hi Mât,
[...]
> setup-storage tell us : "Empty disk_config stanza for device /dev/sdb"
>
There's a fairly recent new sanity check for this, yes, so ...
> We used to declare this type of config like this :
>
[...]
>
> disk_config disk2
>
... this is expected to fail. This was added for the
[...]
>
> Okay, I've setup an FTP server to receive LOGS, so in case of an install
> failure, logs will be saved. (Today I've just got logs by mail on
> successful installs).
>
> Thanks again for your precious time !
> Mât
>
You're welcome! Thanks a lot for providing all the debug information an
Hi Michael,
[...]
> ... this is expected to fail. This was added for the simple reason that the
> semantics of an empty disk_config X entry would be unclear, should existing
> partitions be deleted, should it be used as is, etc.
Ok, I agree with that change.
[...]
> That is unexpected to say th
[...]
> > Would you be willing to give 4.0~beta2+experimental43 another try?
>
> Hrm. Where exactly do I need to change FAI versions, only
> inside the NFS root (if so, I could just chroot and dpkg,
> which is okay for testing, I suppose) or outside too (in
> which case I’d strongly prefer to back
Hi Thomas,
I was trying to create a chroot with fai. Please, help me by looking at this
output:
r...@faiserver:~# fai -c FAIBASE DHCPC DEMO -v -u faichroot dirinstall
/test-chroot/
-
Fully Automatic Installation - F
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 21:31 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Should setup-storage be changed, this will affect anyone using preserve
> options.
> It won't matter that much for fresh installs without preserved partitions, but
> if some partition is preserved and all partitions listed before the
Hi Carsten,
did you set IPAPPEND=2 in pxelinux.cfg/ ?
without that BOOTIF doesn't work and won't be set by pxelinux
Regards,
\sh
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:30 +0100, Carsten Aulbert wrote:
> Hi all
>
> On Wednesday 01 December 2010 19:00:24 Carsten Aulbert wrote:
>
> > > Use fai-chboot -P. The
Hi Thomas,
> Maybe this occured because of an unreadable Release file in the
> fai-project.org package repository. I fixed this. Please try again.
Thanks a lot. It's working fine again :-)
Regards
Martin
--
Dipl. Phys. Martin Konrad
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Institut für Kernphysik
Schlo
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I was trying to create a chroot with fai. Please, help me by looking at this
> output:
>
> r...@faiserver:~# fai -c FAIBASE DHCPC DEMO -v -u faichroot dirinstall
> /test-chroot/
> -
>Fully Automatic
Hello!
Have used FAI for many moons, am now trying to extend functionality to even
more automation. Yay for automation.
Basing my work on previous discussions:
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/2005-September/003593.html
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/2006-February/0
This is on Lucid Ubuntu 10.04
Running: FAI 3.4.2ubuntu1~lucid1~ppa1
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Shadow Roldan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Have used FAI for many moons, am now trying to extend functionality to even
> more automation. Yay for automation.
>
> Basing my work on previous discussions:
> ht
Formatting issue confirmed. I was missing
1>/dev/console
Thanks anyway!
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Shadow Roldan wrote:
> This is on Lucid Ubuntu 10.04
> Running: FAI 3.4.2ubuntu1~lucid1~ppa1
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Shadow Roldan wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Have used FAI for many m
Hi Stephan
On Monday 06 December 2010 15:45:36 Stephan Hermann wrote:
> did you set IPAPPEND=2 in pxelinux.cfg/ ?
>
> without that BOOTIF doesn't work and won't be set by pxelinux
hmm, fai-chboot -P set
IPAPPEND 3
as the final line into the pxeconfig file, I think I need to read a bit more
abou
18 matches
Mail list logo
