> Hi again!
>
> I have a problem setting the console-setup data to the correct values via
> debconf.
>
> On row 85 i fai.log, task_debconf is called and sets all values as according
> to the file
> in debconf/LANG_SWEDISH. (I guess, at least)
>
Check back with your fai.log, I think it should
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
[...]
The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a tribute
to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes behaviour
exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a has
Hi Everybody,
I am writing to you for Packt Publishing, the publishers of computer related
books.
We are planning to extend our catalogue of books on Open Source System and
Network Administration softwares & are currently inviting experts to write for
us. So, if you love FAI and fancy writin
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
I believe resizing of logical volumes with ext2/ext3 should work as of
3.3.5+experimental1; for the moment, resize2fs will *not* be used on normal
partitions as I'd need to take huge pains to make that work reliably, because
resizing of the underlying partition cannot
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >I believe resizing of logical volumes with ext2/ext3 should work as of
> >3.3.5+experimental1; for the moment, resize2fs will *not* be used on normal
> >partitions as I'd need to take huge pains to make that work reliably, because
> >resizing of the underlying part
> > Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> > >I believe resizing of logical volumes with ext2/ext3 should work as of
> > >3.3.5+experimental1; for the moment, resize2fs will *not* be used on normal
> > >partitions as I'd need to take huge pains to make that work reliably,
> > >because
> > >resizing of the
> > > Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> > > >I believe resizing of logical volumes with ext2/ext3 should work as of
> > > >3.3.5+experimental1; for the moment, resize2fs will *not* be used on
> > > >normal
> > > >partitions as I'd need to take huge pains to make that work reliably,
> > > >because
>
In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem to
fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 * 1024 *
1024 bytes before sda2.
Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. What I do suspect is
some rounding issue, and, well t
>
> >
> >In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem to
> >fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 *
> >1024 *
> >1024 bytes before sda2.
> >
> >Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. What I do suspect
> >is
> >som
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem to
fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 * 1024 *
1024 bytes before sda2.
Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. What I do suspect is
some
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >>>In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem
> >>>to
> >>>fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 *
> >>>1024 *
> >>>1024 bytes before sda2.
> >>>
> >>>Was that layout created using setup-storage? Pro
In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem to
fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 * 1024 *
1024 bytes before sda2.
Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. What I do suspect is
some rounding issue, and, well th
>
> >In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't
> >seem to
> >fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 *
> >1024 *
> >1024 bytes before sda2.
> >
> >Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. Wha
In this case, the problem is somewhat unrelated: The partitions don't seem to
fit on disk in this way. That is, there isn't sufficient space for 512 * 1024 *
1024 bytes before sda2.
Was that layout created using setup-storage? Probably yes. What I do suspect is
some rounding issue, and, well th
14 matches
Mail list logo
