Re: OT: broken raid configuration persists too hard [SOLVED, sort of]

2009-10-01 Diskussionsfäden Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 28.09.2009 at 18:11:57 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > after reading mdadm(8) again, I'd like to know why it might be > undesirable to create raids with version 1.2 metadata. I thought I'd record my findings for the archive: 1. mdadm metadata must be in 0.9 format because kernel au

Re: amd64 kernel, but 32bits packages installed?

2009-10-01 Diskussionsfäden Leen Smit
And how does make-nfsroot determine wether to install 64 bit nfsroot?? I've been following these guides : http://faiwiki.informatik.uni-koeln.de/index.php/FAI_Cross-architecture http://www.osburg.org/Ubuntu-fai http://woonuk.springnote.com/pages/1447230.xhtml all to no avail, Im still getting

Re: amd64 kernel, but 32bits packages installed?

2009-10-01 Diskussionsfäden Michael Goetze
Hi Leen, > FAI_DEBOOTSTRAP="lenny http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian --arch amd64" this belongs in FAI_DEBOOTSTRAP_OPTS ... > FAI_DEBOOTSTRAP_OPTS="--exclude=dhcp-client,info ... so this should be "--arch amd64 --exclude=dhcp-client,info" Regards, Michael

Re: amd64 kernel, but 32bits packages installed?

2009-10-01 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Neumann
hiya > And how does make-nfsroot determine wether to install 64 bit nfsroot?? > I've been following these guides : It's been a long time (3.2.4?) since I build my nfs roots, but I think I did these steps: - install a Debian box manually with 64 bit arch - add fai repositories if necessary - setu