2009/9/4 Henning Sprang :
> Slightly OT, but:
>
> adrian15 wrote:
>> that might be solved with Debian new six-month relesase cycle.
>
> Debian's what?
>
> Last thing I heard was two years - did I miss something?
Sorry, I meant two years cycle. The six-month is the Ubuntu's one.
Let's not flame! ;)
adrian15 adrian15 wrote:
> Let's not flame! ;)
That wasn't my intention at all, I just wondered if I missed something,
maybe a decision to implement the CUT
concept(http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/) on a 6 month base...
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
+49 (0) 176 8218
Henning Sprang wrote:
> That wasn't my intention at all, I just wondered if I missed something,
> maybe a decision to implement the CUT
> concept(http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/) on a 6 month base...
Interesting. That would be exactly what we would need to be able to stay
with Debian o
Henning Sprang wrote:
> I'm advocating, that it would have been good at least update and
> dirinstall would be available in Ubuntu.
Softupdate would do for me. You can always install the base in some
other way (Debian FAI server, clonezilla, g4l, ...) and then use
softupdate to get things exactly
