Hi Nicolas!
> Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
> used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
> # parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
Both produce the same result:
# parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
Error:
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Hi Nicolas!
Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
# parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
# parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
Both produce the same result:
# parted -s /d
Hi!
>>> Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
>>> used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
>>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
>>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
>> Both produce the same result:
>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
>>
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Tried that, after manually labeling the drive both "parted" commands
produced no errors, so I restarted the installation. But it still stops
with error:
++ debug=1
Calling task_install
Calling task_partition
Partitioning local harddisks using setup-storage
Starting set
Hi!
>> disklist was:
> Oops, I 've missed this line in your former mail, disklist is not
> supposed to be empty! Output should be at least "disklist was: sda".
> It looks like the nfsroot doesn't see /dev/sda.
After the installation stops with the error, I have a shell on the still
running machi
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Oops, I 've missed this line in your former mail, disklist is not
supposed to be empty! Output should be at least "disklist was: sda".
It looks like the nfsroot doesn't see /dev/sda.
After the installation stops with the error, I have a shell on the still
running m
Hi!
>> So I think inside the NFSroot sda is visible without problems.
> I must agree, but will try again :-) . Can you run
> '/usr/lib/fai/disk-info' in your shell?
Yes, it produces no output. The reason seems to be:
# /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
[...]
stat -c %G /dev/$device
++ stat -c %G /dev/sda
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:20 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
> So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case it
is:
> # ls -al /dev/sda
> brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
Strange. please put your dmesg.log, fai.log and variables.log
Hi!
> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case
> it is:
> > # ls -al /dev/sda
> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> Strange. please put your dmesg.log, fai.log and variables.log onto
> paste.debian.net. Then We may find the problem.
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:48:17 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
> Hi!
>> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case
it is:
>> > # ls -al /dev/sda
>> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> dmesg.log: http://paste.debian.n
Hi again!
> >> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my
> case it is:
> >> > # ls -al /dev/sda
> >> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> > dmesg.log: http://paste.debian.net/36208/
> Your dmesg looks fine. One disk, called sda. So i
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:02:49 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
>> What does cat /proc/partitions say?
> # cat /proc/partitions
> major minor #blocks name
>8 0 143247360 sda
Looks fine.
If the ouput of
bash -x /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
is ok, I would guess it's bec
Hi!
> If the ouput of
> bash -x /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
> is ok, I would guess it's because of the wrong group floppy.
> Check why your disk belongs to the group floppy. Maybe a
> broken udev configuration.
Debian Bug #404927 looks promising:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404927
13 matches
Mail list logo
