Re: fcopy and hooks

2010-02-05 Diskussionsfäden David Ward
This is now working as expected and I cant seem to reproduce my original problem so... sorry to bother you. Regards, Dave On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Lange wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:07:14 -0500, David Ward > said: > >> variables.log shows all expected classes, however f

Re: fcopy and hooks

2010-02-04 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:07:14 -0500, David Ward said: > variables.log shows all expected classes, however fcopy -D shows only some > of them. I'll have a look at the fcopy source. There are two line in fcopy that print a class information. warn "using class: $class\n" if $debug;

Re: fcopy and hooks

2010-02-04 Diskussionsfäden David Ward
variables.log shows all expected classes, however fcopy -D shows only some of them. I'll have a look at the fcopy source. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Lange wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:35:17 -0500, David Ward > said: > >> It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some cl

Re: fcopy and hooks

2010-02-04 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> Hi, > It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For > ex. if I call it from > hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being defined. > Is that the > intended behavior? That seems to be very strange (and possibly some bug) - could you add a simple

Re: fcopy and hooks

2010-02-04 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:35:17 -0500, David Ward said: > It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For > ex. if I call it from > hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being defined. > Is that the > intended behavior? No. f

fcopy and hooks

2010-02-04 Diskussionsfäden David Ward
Hi, It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For ex. if I call it from hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being defined. Is that the intended behavior? Thanks, Dave