This is now working as expected and I cant seem to reproduce my original
problem so... sorry to bother you.
Regards,
Dave
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Lange
wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:07:14 -0500, David Ward
> said:
>
>> variables.log shows all expected classes, however f
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:07:14 -0500, David Ward said:
> variables.log shows all expected classes, however fcopy -D shows only some
> of them. I'll have a look at the fcopy source.
There are two line in fcopy that print a class information.
warn "using class: $class\n" if $debug;
variables.log shows all expected classes, however fcopy -D shows only some
of them. I'll have a look at the fcopy source.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Lange
wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:35:17 -0500, David Ward
> said:
>
>> It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some cl
> Hi,
> It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For
> ex. if I call it from
> hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being defined.
> Is that the
> intended behavior?
That seems to be very strange (and possibly some bug) - could you add a simple
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:35:17 -0500, David Ward said:
> It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For
> ex. if I call it from
> hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being
defined.
> Is that the
> intended behavior?
No. f
Hi,
It seems when I use fcopy from a hook only some classes are defined. For
ex. if I call it from
hooks/configure.XYZ then fcopy -D does not show class XYZ as being defined.
Is that the
intended behavior?
Thanks,
Dave