Am 16.06.2014 11:14, schrieb Thomas Lange:
> >> Please fill out http://fai-project.org/questionnaire
> > Already done that a few years ago, although the envirtonment has changed
> > significantly since. Should I fill it out again?
> Yes, please.
>
> > If there is anything I can do
Am 16.06.2014 11:14, schrieb Thomas Lange:
> >> Please fill out http://fai-project.org/questionnaire
> > Already done that a few years ago, although the envirtonment has changed
> > significantly since. Should I fill it out again?
> Yes, please.
>
> > If there is anything I can do t
Hi,
Am 16.06.2014 11:04, schrieb Thomas Lange:
> What are you using pbuilder for? For building the base file or for
> building the FAI packages? In fai-doc there's the script mk-basefile
> which shows how to buid base files for different distributions. I'm
> using debootstrap for Debian based dist
> We need someone how can test newer FAI version on Ubuntu. If you could
> give FAI 4.2 a try on an Ubuntu server and install Ubuntu
> 14.04 using it, that would be great. There's also a testing PPA
> which includes FAI 4.1.1. Even testing this version would help us.
>
> https://launchpad.net/~fai
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:35:55 +0200, Robert Markula
> said:
>> Please fill out http://fai-project.org/questionnaire
> Already done that a few years ago, although the envirtonment has changed
> significantly since. Should I fill it out again?
Yes, please.
> If there is a
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:29:30 +0200, Robert Markula
> said:
> thank you very much for your input. I've found the culprit - the Ubuntu
> 14.04 pbuilder package still uses the 'saucy' distribution tag by
> default due to a bug [1]. Once I set the 'DISTRIBUTION' option in
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:39:38 +0200, Robert Markula
> said:
> I'm using FAI quite a lot mainly installing Ubuntu 10.04 and Ubuntu
> 12.04-based servers and hosts. The FAI server itself is currently an
> Ubuntu 12.04-based machine.
That sounds interesting. Did you ever fill
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 23:39 +0200, Robert Markula wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> after a few days of unsuccessful troubleshooting I'm afraid I have to
> ask for your help :-)
>
> Any idea what might be wrong? Or where to look at? Does anybody have a
> setup where installing Ubuntu 14.04 actually works?