Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-19 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> > >>Today I've got twice the same result with preserve_lazy, where > >>setup-storage claims that it will preserve volumes, nevertheless > >>removes them, and then fails because it can't find them. But no > >>kernel error. > >> > >>http://paste.debian.net/69021/ > >> > > > >Ok, I had a strange "l

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-19 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Today I've got twice the same result with preserve_lazy, where setup-storage claims that it will preserve volumes, nevertheless removes them, and then fails because it can't find them. But no kernel error. http://paste.debian.net/69021/ Ok, I had a strange "last;" to break out of the lo

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-16 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> > > > >Is it by any means possible for me to get remote access to that system to do > >some more try&error? Otherwise I can just ask to to try to re-do the same > >steps > >setup-storage makes, manually. It's too strange. > > > > I would be happy to give you a remote access but... can't reprod

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-15 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Is it by any means possible for me to get remote access to that system to do some more try&error? Otherwise I can just ask to to try to re-do the same steps setup-storage makes, manually. It's too strange. I would be happy to give you a remote access but... can't reproduce the problem to

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-15 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
[...] > I had started lvm before running the commands, but it's not enough > to reproduce the problem. I have also tried to run them after having > stopped the installation, didn't work either. If you manually re-run setup-storage, does that at least have the same problems as before? It could be

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Michael Tautschnig a écrit : Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to do some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into setup-storage? On that particular host, I'd like to know how parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos parted -s /dev/sda mkpar

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> > >Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to > >do > >some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into > >setup-storage? > > > >On that particular host, I'd like to know how > > > >parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos > >parted -s /dev/sda mkpar

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to do some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into setup-storage? On that particular host, I'd like to know how parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos parted -s /dev/sda mkpart primary ext3 512B 53687142

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > >>Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > >>>[...] > >>> > The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a > tribute > to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes > behaviour > exactly as you described

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-08 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Michael Tautschnig a écrit : Michael Tautschnig a écrit : [...] The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a tribute to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes behaviour exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a has

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-04-06 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > >[...] > > > >>The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a > >>tribute > >>to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes > >>behaviour > >>exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cann

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-03-25 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel
Michael Tautschnig a écrit : [...] The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a tribute to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes behaviour exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cannot tell whether it'll be

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2010-03-12 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
[...] > > The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a > tribute > to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes > behaviour > exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cannot tell > whether it'll be done in a day or

Re: Still puzzled by setup-storage

2009-12-28 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
> Hi all, > > I'm still puzzled by setup-storage (fai 3.2.17~lenny1). Imagine a server with > two (locical) device sda and sdb and the following disk_layout: > > disk_config disk1 disklabel:msdos bootable:1 > > primary /boot 128 ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro > primary /