>
> >>Today I've got twice the same result with preserve_lazy, where
> >>setup-storage claims that it will preserve volumes, nevertheless
> >>removes them, and then fails because it can't find them. But no
> >>kernel error.
> >>
> >>http://paste.debian.net/69021/
> >>
> >
> >Ok, I had a strange "l
Today I've got twice the same result with preserve_lazy, where
setup-storage claims that it will preserve volumes, nevertheless
removes them, and then fails because it can't find them. But no
kernel error.
http://paste.debian.net/69021/
Ok, I had a strange "last;" to break out of the lo
>
> >
> >Is it by any means possible for me to get remote access to that system to do
> >some more try&error? Otherwise I can just ask to to try to re-do the same
> >steps
> >setup-storage makes, manually. It's too strange.
> >
>
> I would be happy to give you a remote access but... can't reprod
Is it by any means possible for me to get remote access to that system to do
some more try&error? Otherwise I can just ask to to try to re-do the same steps
setup-storage makes, manually. It's too strange.
I would be happy to give you a remote access but... can't reproduce the
problem to
[...]
> I had started lvm before running the commands, but it's not enough
> to reproduce the problem. I have also tried to run them after having
> stopped the installation, didn't work either.
If you manually re-run setup-storage, does that at least have the same problems
as before? It could be
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to do
some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into
setup-storage?
On that particular host, I'd like to know how
parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos
parted -s /dev/sda mkpar
>
> >Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to
> >do
> >some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into
> >setup-storage?
> >
> >On that particular host, I'd like to know how
> >
> >parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos
> >parted -s /dev/sda mkpar
Ok, this will need some more experimental work I'm afraid. Could you try to do
some manual steps and report back before we actually build this into
setup-storage?
On that particular host, I'd like to know how
parted -s /dev/sda mklabel msdos
parted -s /dev/sda mkpart primary ext3 512B 53687142
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >>Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a
> tribute
> to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes
> behaviour
> exactly as you described
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
[...]
The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a tribute
to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes behaviour
exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a has
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >[...]
> >
> >>The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a
> >>tribute
> >>to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes
> >>behaviour
> >>exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cann
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
[...]
The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a tribute
to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes behaviour
exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cannot tell
whether it'll be
[...]
>
> The much nicer approach is introducing something like preserve_lazy:1 (a
> tribute
> to lazyformat...; but hints for better names are welcome) which causes
> behaviour
> exactly as you described. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle, but I cannot tell
> whether it'll be done in a day or
> Hi all,
>
> I'm still puzzled by setup-storage (fai 3.2.17~lenny1). Imagine a server with
> two (locical) device sda and sdb and the following disk_layout:
>
> disk_config disk1 disklabel:msdos bootable:1
>
> primary /boot 128 ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro
> primary /
14 matches
Mail list logo