Hi Michael,
On Friday 26 February 2010 21:24:24 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I just checked the contents of the packages from cologne, indeed the fix is
> in there. Do you also have the koeln repository in
> /etc/fai/apt/sources.list? AFAIK this is what make-fai-nfsroot uses for
> installing pac
Hi
On Friday 26 February 2010 21:23:51 Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> ... not entirely on topic, besides that we would love to be able
> to manage our (many) thumpers with fai:
>
> we tried running linux on a thumper some time ago and it sucked
> badly. the raid drivers were just not ready for product
> Hi
>
> On Friday 26 February 2010 20:48:32 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >
> > Well, but that fix should be in FAI 3.3.3 (which you claimed you are
> > using)!?
> >
> That's what dpkg -l keeps telling me (and what's pulled in form cologne).
>
> The nfsroot was freshly created yesterday and the
Hi
On Friday 26 February 2010 20:48:32 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> Well, but that fix should be in FAI 3.3.3 (which you claimed you are
> using)!?
>
That's what dpkg -l keeps telling me (and what's pulled in form cologne).
The nfsroot was freshly created yesterday and the web interface tells
> OK, I think the error I hit was already fixed in SVN head:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/fai/trunk/lib/setup-
> storage/Init.pm?op=diff&rev=5691&sc=0
>
Well, but that fix should be in FAI 3.3.3 (which you claimed you are using)!?
> Can anyone tell me, why sdt was the "old" limit?
>
I think
OK, I think the error I hit was already fixed in SVN head:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/fai/trunk/lib/setup-
storage/Init.pm?op=diff&rev=5691&sc=0
Can anyone tell me, why sdt was the "old" limit?
Cheers
Carsten
Resending without the attachment (Thomas, 15kB is REALLY strict)
Hi Alex,
On Friday 26 February 2010 09:19:35 Alexander Bugl wrote:
>
> Are you sure about sdy?
>
I thought so, as I looked before where no GPT label was
> According to http://docs.sun.com/source/820-4893-13/rhel.html Table 4-1
>
Hi Carsten!
> we are currently trying FAI 3.3.3 on a thumper (Sun Fire x4500) but right now
> it does not like it too much:
> Executing: parted -s /dev/sdy unit chs print free
>
> Executing: parted -s /dev/sdz unit TiB print
>
