BTW, I am wondering what would be the corresponding BTRFS config.
Does something like this work as expected or not (mixing / and /tmp this time) :
```
disk_config disk1 disklabel:gpt bootable:1 fstabkey:uuid
primary - 2G --
primary - 70% --
primary - 0- --
d
Hi,
After digging some time around this issue, I am finally able to boot
the RAID1 partition with EFI boot enabled on it (using this example:
https://fai-project.org/download/misc/disk_config/lvm-on-luks-on-raid).
Here is my final disk_config file:
```# example of new config file for setup-stora
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for suggestions.
Now, my file "disk_config/GRUB_EFI_RAID1" is [*]:
```
# example of new config file for setup-storage
#
#
disk_config disk1 disklabel:gpt fstabkey:uuid bootable:1
primary - 2G - -
primary /boot/efi 1G vfat rw createopts="-F32"
primary - 2G - -
primary -
Nice, good work.
A couple of suggestions...
I'd put swap on RAID1, if you have a disk go offline while the system is
running, you've lost anything that had been swapped out to the swap on the
failed disk.
I like to put a 100MB partition at the end of disks in a RAID pair to allow
for slightly di
Ok, FYI, I think I have a working configuration with :
```
# example of new config file for setup-storage
#
#
disk_config disk1 disklabel:gpt fstabkey:uuid bootable:1
primary - 2G - -
primary /boot/efi 1G vfat rw createopts="-F32"
primary swap 2G swap sw,pri=1
primary - 0- - -
#disk_conf
What is strange here, is that md1 is found, as well as md0, but
contrary to md0, md1 have an UUID ...
However, UUID seems to be retrieve by blkid from /dev/disk/by-id,
where both md array have their own mdadm UUID, but only md1 have an
UUID from LVM (with pvdisplay / pvs ) ...
Le jeu. 30 nov. 20
Hi Andrew,
Indeed, this removed the syntax issue. However, I have a new error now:
```
/sbin/blkid -c /dev/null -s UUID -o value /dev/md0 had exit code 2
Command had non-zero exit code
```
Indeed, blkid is not able to found md0 UUID.
I tried to modify the disk_config file to avoid this error, bu
Hey,
On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 11:14 +0100, Rémy Dernat wrote:
> Hi awesome Fai guys,
>
> I have a weird syntax issue with the following disk_config:
>
[snip]
> disk_config raid disklabel:gpt fstabkey:uuid bootable:1
This line is your problem, remove everything after the word raid. So it
should jus
Hi awesome Fai guys,
I have a weird syntax issue with the following disk_config:
```
# example of new config file for setup-storage
#
#
disk_config disk1 disklabel:gpt fstabkey:uuid
primary - 2G - -
primary /boot/efi 1G vfat rw createopts="-F32"
primary swap 2G swap sw,pri=1
primary - 0-
t; ;;
-Original Message-
From: linux-fai On Behalf Of Thomas Lange
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 9:57 AM
To: fully automatic installation for Linux
Subject: RE: RAID 0 Disk config.
EXTERNAL
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:34:11 +, Marc Hoppins via linux-fai
>>&g
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:34:11 +, Marc Hoppins via linux-fai
> said:
> Would the wipe-all script sit in class, like
> 20-hwdetect.sh
> 21-wipe-all.sh
No, put those script into hooks/
and name them for e.g. partition.WIPEDISKS
Then it get executed before the partitioning
Subject: RE: RAID 0 Disk config.
EXTERNAL
Here you can find two small bash scripts, one called wipe-all which removes all
partitions without caring about raid or lvm.
The other script is called partition.WIPEDISKS is a FAI hooks and first stops
lvm and raid then does the wipefs call.
https://fai
Here you can find two small bash scripts, one called wipe-all
which removes all partitions without caring about raid or lvm.
The other script is called partition.WIPEDISKS is a FAI hooks and
first stops lvm and raid then does the wipefs call.
https://fai-project.org/download/misc/
set terminal process group (1076): inappropriate ioctl for device
messages.
Food for thought.
Marc
-Original Message-
From: linux-fai On Behalf Of Thomas Lange
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 2:39 PM
To: fully automatic installation for Linux
Subject: RE: RAID 0 Disk config.
EXTERNAL
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:11:23 +, Marc Hoppins via linux-fai
> said:
> Another disk question if I may, does FAI test for existing partitions on
the target disk? I think the reason I was getting failures is that the target
probably had partitions created by a previous, failed FA
automatic installation for Linux
Subject: Re: RAID 0 Disk config.
EXTERNAL
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:56:35 +, Marc Hoppins via linux-fai
>>>>> said:
> For a RAID config, the documentation only specifies pre-sized partitions
which I do not want. I c
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:56:35 +, Marc Hoppins via linux-fai
> said:
> For a RAID config, the documentation only specifies pre-sized partitions
which I do not want. I currently have:
Hi Marc,
without checking I guess our tool does not support raw disks for this
setup. But you
Diese Nachricht wurde eingewickelt um DMARC-kompatibel zu sein. Die
eigentliche Nachricht steht dadurch in einem Anhang.
This message was wrapped to be DMARC compliant. The actual message
text is therefore in an attachment.--- Begin Message ---
Apologies for previous message...forgot to suggest pl
inux
/dev/sda9 123734026 1952448511 914357243 83 Linux
Why is the first partition starting at 2048 instead of 1? If I look at the
disk in cfdisk, it's showing 1.05MB of free space at the beginning of the
disk...although it's a trivial amount of space being lost, why am
at the
disk in cfdisk, it's showing 1.05MB of free space at the beginning of the
disk...although it's a trivial amount of space being lost, why am I losing
it?
I have a Debian Squeeze system running FAI 3.4.7 and I don't see that problem
when using the same disk config.
An
I look at
the disk in cfdisk, it's showing 1.05MB of free space at the beginning of
the disk...although it's a trivial amount of space being lost, why am I
losing it?
I have a Debian Squeeze system running FAI 3.4.7 and I don't see that
problem when using the same disk config.
Any
From: ahmta...@hotmail.com
To: cour...@cena.fr
Subject: RE: Disk config
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:40:38 +0200
>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:37:42 +0200
>From: cour...@cena.fr
>To: linux-fai@uni-koeln.de
>Subject: Re: Disk config
>
Le 16/06/2011 12:14,
Le 16/06/2011 12:14, Ahmed Altaher a écrit :
Dearest all,
I succeded installing Ubuntu 10.10 from Debian squeeze based FAI.
But my problem is; how could I preserve the 1st partition that
includes Windows 7.
my disk config is
disk_config sda preserve_always:1,2 bootable:3
primary - 0
Hi,
[...]
> But my problem is; how could I preserve the 1st partition that includes
> Windows 7.
>
> my disk config is
>
> disk_config sda preserve_always:1,2 bootable:3
> primary - 0 - -
> primary - 0 - -
> primary /boot 512ext3rw
Dearest all,
I succeded installing Ubuntu 10.10 from Debian squeeze based FAI.
But my problem is; how could I preserve the 1st partition that includes Windows
7.
my disk config is
disk_config sda preserve_always:1,2 bootable:3
primary - 0 - -
primary - 0 - -
primary /boot 512
Hi,
the bug is solved and a few days ago the patch was merged from sid to squeeze.
Best regards,
Manuel
Thanks, this soved it. I installed it in the chroot
Easy fix:
chroot to the nfs root, and install libblkid1 from sid.
Make sure you remove sid apt sources after you're done, if you do add them.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Manuel Hachtkemper
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Executing: mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
>> Command mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1 had exit c
Hello,
>Executing: mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
>Command mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1 had exit code 1
there is a bug in e2fsprogs in debian squeeze. (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583551 )
The bug is fixed in sid, but the package wasn't merged to squeeze, yet.
Best regards,
Manuel H
Hi,
I have used fai with lenny without problems
No i try to test it with squeeze.
When I boot my first client I get an error in task partition
With Lenny the disk_config file was working fine
failog:
/FAI_ACTION: install
Performing FAI installation. All data may be overwritten!
^G^G^G
Calling ta
30 matches
Mail list logo
