On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, David Magda wrote:
> On Tue, September 25, 2012 03:02, Toomas Tamm wrote:
>
> > Getting all this data into machine-readable form and onto your FAI
> > server may well involve a lot more manual labour than typing an unique
> > secret into each machine at install ti
On Tue, September 25, 2012 03:02, Toomas Tamm wrote:
> Getting all this data into machine-readable form and onto your FAI
> server may well involve a lot more manual labour than typing an unique
> secret into each machine at install time...
[...]
Depending on your hardware vendor, it may be possi
Hi Denny
[...]
> "My config space is indeed in order of 10GB :> "
>
> If you have to transfer ~10GB to several clients at the same time, and you
> are not satisfied with the speed (NFS / tar ...) you should reconsider the
> underlying protocol. I red month ago an article to use bittorrent to
> tr
Am 25.09.2012 um 10:07 schrieb Thomas Neumann :
>> so it would be better, to use ftp to transmit the big files.
> two different entvironments and didn't know about the glory of revision
> control systems. Tar'ing and copying 500MB of data gets old quite fast.]
because:
[...]
"My config space is
> so it would be better, to use ftp to transmit the big files.
Why? [I have to admit using http to transfer the base-images to the
install clients. But this was when I had to sync the config space between
two different entvironments and didn't know about the glory of revision
control systems. Tar'
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, Michał Dwużnik wrote:
>
> Combination of e.g. service tag, disk serial number and memory module
> serials seems reasonably close to being unique and immutable.
Getting all this data into machine-readable form and onto your FAI
server may well involve a lot more
