On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 11:49:31PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On 2025/4/7 19:40, Karel Zak wrote:
> > We can improve it in libmount and add any if-erofs hack there, but my
> > suggestion is to select a better name for the mount option. For
> > example, erofsoff=, erostart=,
imit= are older than any
currently used convention (I see the option in mount code from year
1998).
We can improve it in libmount and add any if-erofs hack there, but my
suggestion is to select a better name for the mount option. For
example, erofsoff=, erostart=, fsoffset=, start=, or similar.
