Re: [PATCH] erofs: allow 16-byte volume name again

2025-03-15 Thread Chao Yu
On 2025/2/25 11:39, Gao Xiang wrote: Actually, volume name doesn't need to include the NIL terminator if the string length matches the on-disk field size as mentioned in [1]. I tend to relax it together with the upcoming 48-bit block addressing (or stable kernels which backport this fix) so that

[PATCH] erofs: allow 16-byte volume name again

2025-02-24 Thread Gao Xiang
Actually, volume name doesn't need to include the NIL terminator if the string length matches the on-disk field size as mentioned in [1]. I tend to relax it together with the upcoming 48-bit block addressing (or stable kernels which backport this fix) so that we could have a chance to record a 16-