On 2025/1/18 09:25, Ian Kent wrote:
On 18/1/25 08:45, Ian Kent wrote:
On 17/1/25 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without report anything when `fs_parse` return
On 18/1/25 08:45, Ian Kent wrote:
On 17/1/25 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without report anything when `fs_parse` return an unknown `opt`.
But if an option is u
On 17/1/25 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without report anything when `fs_parse` return an unknown `opt`.
But if an option is unknown to erofs, I mean that option
On 2025/1/17 18:00, Chen Linxuan wrote:
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:54 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
On 2025/1/17 17:50, Chen Linxuan wrote:
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:28 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Linxuan,
On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_pa
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:54 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> On 2025/1/17 17:50, Chen Linxuan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:28 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > Hi Linxuan,
> > >
> > > On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
> > > > While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:54 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> On 2025/1/17 17:50, Chen Linxuan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:28 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > Hi Linxuan,
> > >
> > > On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
> > > > While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
On 2025/1/17 17:50, Chen Linxuan wrote:
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:28 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Linxuan,
On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without re
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 17:28 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Linxuan,
>
> On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
> > While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
> > return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
> > without report anything when `fs_parse`
Hi Linxuan,
On 2025/1/17 16:52, Chen Linxuan wrote:
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without report anything when `fs_parse` return an unknown `opt`.
But if an option is unknown to erofs, I m
While reading erofs code, I notice that `erofs_fc_parse_param` will
return -ENOPARAM, which means that erofs do not support this option,
without report anything when `fs_parse` return an unknown `opt`.
But if an option is unknown to erofs, I mean that option not in
`erofs_fs_parameters` at all, `f
10 matches
Mail list logo
