On Wednesday 18 July 2007 11:22, P. van Gaans wrote:
> timecop wrote:
> > Edit the sores, and replace %04x with %d or wahtever suits your fancy.
> > > never mind the fact that since actual real programmers write windows
> > apps, this wouldn't be a problem in teh first place)>
[snip]
> I was serio
Do you have a problem with my suggestion?
It is, correct, by the way.
-tc
On 7/18/07, P. van Gaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> timecop wrote:
> > Edit the sores, and replace %04x with %d or wahtever suits your fancy.
> > > never mind the fact that since actual real programmers write windows
> >
timecop wrote:
> Edit the sores, and replace %04x with %d or wahtever suits your fancy.
> never mind the fact that since actual real programmers write windows
> apps, this wouldn't be a problem in teh first place)>
>
> -tc
>
> On 7/18/07, P. van Gaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tuned to som
Edit the sores, and replace %04x with %d or wahtever suits your fancy.
-tc
On 7/18/07, P. van Gaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tuned to something with tzap. That gives output like this:
>
> status 1f | signal 9a9a | snr fafa | ber 00013ed2 | unc |
> FE_HAS_LOCK
> status 1f | signal
I tuned to something with tzap. That gives output like this:
status 1f | signal 9a9a | snr fafa | ber 00013ed2 | unc |
FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal 9898 | snr fbfb | ber 00011dbe | unc |
FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal 9595 | snr fcfc | ber 00011678 | unc 0005 |
FE_HAS_LO
