Le mardi 17 avril 2007 12:37, Christoph Pfister a écrit :
> > So - where would I find those specifications?
>
> For this issue EN 300 468 (a 1.1 mb pdf file) is relevant - the information
> about the other transponders is in the so called NIT (network information
> table). That table is part of th
Hi,
[Hartmut, the part for you is at the bottom]
Am Montag, 16. April 2007 04:37 schrieb Dirk Ritter:
> Hello! :-)
>
> Am 2007.04.15 11:57 schrieb(en) Christoph Pfister:
>
> [ on mostly automatic scans ]
>
> > This procedure is specified by the dvb standard.
>
> So - where would I find those spec
Hi,
Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 06:31 schrieb Dirk Ritter:
> Hello again!
>
> Am 2007.04.13 15:51 schrieb(en) Christoph Pfister:
> > You can omit those frequencies scan is able to
> > find by analyzing the stream.
>
> Indeed. And it seems to have the ability to
> tune into known frequencies, so it
Hi,
Am Freitag, 13. April 2007 13:41 schrieb Dirk Ritter:
> Hello Christoph, hello Maik!
>
> First off - thank you very much for your
> time and efforts. This is much appreciated.
> However, I went to the trouble to verify
> against a scan, run, using only one single
> initial frequency, letting
Dirk Ritter wrote:
> Hello Christoph, hello Maik!
>
> First off - thank you very much for your
> time and efforts. This is much appreciated.
>
> Am 2007.04.12 22:11 schrieb(en) Christoph Pfister:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your tuning files have differences, so there are
> > e.g. qam64 or qam256 used for
Christoph Pfister wrote:
> Your tuning files have differences
After cleaning and sorting the files, the situation looks like this:
de-KabelBW-Dirk de-KabelBW-Maik
C 11300 690 NONE QAM64 C 11300 690 NONE QAM64
C 12100 690 NONE QAM64
