On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:03:16AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> I explained in one of my former mails in this thread, why this could
> not happen with the -MD flag. Because of that the explicit
> dependencies for the .d files are not necessary.
>
> You may want to read
> http://www.linuxtv.org/
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:28:06AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 06:21:23AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:44:35PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > What you need is a set of make rules like the following:
> >
> > You don't.
> >
> > > inc
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 06:21:23AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:44:35PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > What you need is a set of make rules like the following:
>
> You don't.
>
> > include $(patsubst %.o:%.dep,$(OBJS))
>
> What do you think the "-include $(wildca
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:44:35PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> What you need is a set of make rules like the following:
You don't.
> include $(patsubst %.o:%.dep,$(OBJS))
What do you think the "-include $(wildcard *.d) dummy" is for?
> $(BUILD)/%.d : %.c
>gcc -MM -MG $< | sed -
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:04:37AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Florian Schirmer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >>>1. Doesn't adding -MD to the extra flags is enough to make the
> > >>>dependencys work? At least with gcc 3.1 (haven't tried any version
> > >>>be
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Florian Schirmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>>1. Doesn't adding -MD to the extra flags is enough to make the
> >>>dependencys work? At least with gcc 3.1 (haven't tried any version
> >>>below) it seems to work pretty well without any include changes to
> >>>the M
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:07:49PM +0100, Holger Waechtler wrote:
> Florian Schirmer wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >>Not if '$(wildcard *.d)' doesn't return any names.
> >>'-include' only suppresses error messages if any of the _given_ files
> >
> >doesn't exist.
> >
> >Two things i would like to add:
>
Florian Schirmer wrote:
Hi,
Not if '$(wildcard *.d)' doesn't return any names.
'-include' only suppresses error messages if any of the _given_ files
doesn't exist.
Two things i would like to add:
1. Doesn't adding -MD to the extra flags is enough to make the
dependencys work? At least with
