Re: [linux-dvb] Suspend/resume for Mantis 2033 driver

2007-08-03 Thread CIJOML
COOL!!! First driver implementing suspend/resume! Do you plan add suspend/resume also to other drivers? I can help testing dib0700/dib7000/pluto2/opera drivers Michal Dne sobota 04 srpen 2007 08:02 Marko Ristola napsal(a): > Hi Manu and all > > I have done small improvements into Mantis drivers

[linux-dvb] Suspend/resume for Mantis 2033 driver

2007-08-03 Thread Marko Ristola
Hi Manu and all I have done small improvements into Mantis drivers: I have fixed the insmod/rmmod problem and I have implemented suspend/resume for cu1216. It does in mantis_dvb.c "power off"/ "power on" if no application uses the frontend. So with my suspend/resume and with non-USB sound output

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Manu Abraham
On 8/4/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/4/07, Michael Krufky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Manu Abraham wrote: > > > On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > > >>> Do we really want to have adapter numbers

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Manu Abraham
On 8/4/07, Michael Krufky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: > > On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > >>> Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ? > >>> IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Michael Krufky
Manu Abraham wrote: > On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: >>> Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ? >>> IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that. >> I think it's worthwhile to have it. >>> Is th

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Manu Abraham
On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > > > > Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ? > > IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that. > > I think it's worthwhile to have it. > > > > Is there any other

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Janne Grunau
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > > Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ? > IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that. I think it's worthwhile to have it. > > Is there any other possible better alternatives ? Something similiar is possible wit

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Michael Krufky
Manu Abraham wrote: > On 8/2/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't >> result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers. >> >> V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate >> static minor n

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Janne Grunau
On Friday 03 August 2007 21:28:01 Michael Krufky wrote: > I say Janne should continue on and convert the rest of the drivers... > Is anybody opposed? done Janne Adds adapter_nr module parameter to all dvb drivers to specify the preferred allocation of device minor numbers per driver. Signed-off-

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Manu Abraham
On 8/2/07, Janne Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't > result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers. > > V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate > static minor numbers per driver. > Attached

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driverspecific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Steven Toth
> I like this a lot -- In fact, I think I love it. I don't have anything > negative > to say about this at all. I've always wanted a module option for this. True, > it can be done with udev, but that's no reason not to move forward. > > I say Janne should continue on and convert the rest of th

Re: [linux-dvb] Doubt about the file: dvb-usb-dvb.c

2007-08-03 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Qui, 2007-08-02 às 09:39 +0800, lwtbenben escreveu: > >a) create a newer dir with your driver: > > /linux/drivers/media/dvb/mydriver > >b) Under /linux/drivers/media/dvb/mydriver: > > create a Kconfig and a Makefile > > You may use another Kconfig/Makefile as example (for example, > pluto2) >

Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC PATCH] Choose dvb adapter number with a driver specific module option

2007-08-03 Thread Michael Krufky
Janne Grunau wrote: > Hi, > > Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't > result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers. > > V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate > static minor numbers per driver. > Attached patch adds a similiar mechan

Re: [linux-dvb] Wiki questions ... Hauppauge NOVA-T-500 and others

2007-08-03 Thread Nicolas Will
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 10:18 -0400, CityK wrote: > (and thanks for the good work in the wiki) Just a tiny bit of work in return for the huge amount of work given by the devs. nico ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/

[linux-dvb] TwinHan Magicbox VP7041 does not find any channels

2007-08-03 Thread Boris Andratzek
Hej all, I'm new to this list and subscribed because I am trying to bring my TwinHan MagicBox VP7041 USB to work and I'm having troubles... But first let me say thank you to everybody spending his ressource to this project!! Here is my case: I try to make kaffeine or xine working with my DVB-T

Re: [linux-dvb] Merging hvr3000 into main branch

2007-08-03 Thread CityK
And there we have it -- straight from the horse's mouth! Thanks for the status info Steve. ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] Merging hvr3000 into main branch

2007-08-03 Thread Steven Toth
CityK wrote: > Emilio Castellano wrote: > >> I've been using steve's branch for hauppauge hvr3000 for a while.I'd >> like to know if somebody >> knows when it'll be commited steve's branch with dvb-s support to the >> main branch. >> >> > > As I believe that the hvr-3000 is fairly

Re: [linux-dvb] Merging hvr3000 into main branch

2007-08-03 Thread CityK
Emilio Castellano wrote: > I've been using steve's branch for hauppauge hvr3000 for a while.I'd like > to know if somebody > knows when it'll be commited steve's branch with dvb-s support to the > main branch. > As I believe that the hvr-3000 is fairly similar (except S2?) to the hvr-400

Re: [linux-dvb] Wiki questions ... Hauppauge NOVA-T-500 and others

2007-08-03 Thread CityK
CityK wrote: > Cheers (and thanks for the good work in the wiki) And to you too Darren! Good stuff. ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] Wiki questions ... Hauppauge NOVA-T-500 and others

2007-08-03 Thread CityK
Nicolas Will wrote: > what version of the page are you looking at ? I had jotted a few notes down the other day and just got a chance to address these questions...I only glanced at the page today > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 08:57 -0400, CityK wrote: > >> 1) Firmware listed looks to be the old (bugg

Re: [linux-dvb] Help with writing a DVB driver

2007-08-03 Thread Thomas Gambier
Hello Andreas On 02/08/07, Thomas Gambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 02/08/07, Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello Thomas, > > > > There is another open source driver implementing the audio and video > > decoder API: > > > > http://cvs.tuxbox.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.

Re: [linux-dvb] Wiki questions ... Hauppauge NOVA-T-500 and others

2007-08-03 Thread Nicolas Will
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 08:57 -0400, CityK wrote: > 1) Firmware listed looks to be the old (buggy) one ... can someone > correct please this has been corrected yesterday, http://linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-NOVA-T-500#Firmware pointing to http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/ho

Re: [linux-dvb] Wiki questions ... Hauppauge NOVA-T-500 and others

2007-08-03 Thread CityK
1) Firmware listed looks to be the old (buggy) one ... can someone correct please 2) What is the "Bristol" reference ? ... I changed it on the wiki page to read that it is a reference board design (just a guess), but I'm not sure if that's right or where this "Bristol" bit is even coming from. 3

Re: [linux-dvb] feedback, nova-t 500

2007-08-03 Thread Nicolas Will
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 08:47 +0200, Henrik Beckman wrote: > Haven´t tried that. > But I will update to the latest code and firmware next week and do a > check if the reception patch is still needed > and general functionality test. I am trying it. It patches fine, it compiles fine, and the modu