Hi,
I'm not quite sure, which module's responsibility this is. Which
function calls should increase the respective module counts?
E.g. should each new call to dvb_start_feed increase the skystar2's
usage count and each call to dvb_stop_feed decrease it?
What about the frontends?
Niklas
Herna
Hello,
I just installed a new Gentoo system with kernel 2.6.2 and the dvb
drivers compiled as modules.
The modules are loading fine, /dev/dvb will be created, but not
populated. Devfs is running and
a file containg:
> REGISTER ^dvb/adapter[0-9]+/[^/]+$ PERMISSIONS root.video 0660
exists in /etc/d
gcc -I/vol/8/rpm/BUILD/linuxtv-dvb-1.1.0/build-2.4/include -D__KERNEL__ -I/vol/7/src/linux-2.4.21-0.13mdk/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586
-DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /vol/7/src/linux-2.4.21-0
Hi,
I've found a problem with skystar2 / mt312 modules (DVB version 1.1.0)
with the kernel 2.4.24.
Let's first insert the skystar2 module:
skynet:~# modprobe skystar2
skynet:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
skystar2 16640 0 (unused)
dvb-core
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Alexis de Lattre wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004, Manuel Hartl wrote :
> > does anybody have the same experiences with these kernels?!
> > 2.6.0 does run flawlessly for days.
> > with kernel 2.6.2rc3 i could take this picture:
> > http://www.hartl-it.de/linux
Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> Hi, I've noticed this too, but with the STV0299. I can lock to all
signals
>around a symbol rate of 2750 , but not to any which have a much
lower
>one. I've got a feeling I'm going to have to look at the TT driver to
get >the exact settings as well for that.
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 18:53, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
> > > I have been trying to figure out why the windows software gets
> > > better signal quality than the linux drivers on some channels.
> >
> > FWIW, I compared the tuner control code of the TT driver
> > (2.16a) against
> > the Linux s
Sharath H. S wrote:
> Can anybody reply on this please.
Sure.
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [linux-dvb] Regarding PES data from Demux
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:15:43 +0530
I don't reply to mails with a totally bogus From: line like that.
> I am using the li
