[linux-dvb] Alphacrypt CI Low Priority? (was: Re: VDR 0.82 and Alphacrypt CI)

2001-06-22 Thread Stephan Schreiber
Hello Henning, thanks for your answer! It helps me, as it says I have done nothing wrong. So I'll have to boot Windows whenever I want to record or view something encrypted, is that right? And I'll have to crawl behind my machine and insert the alphacrypt, because with inserted module the Linux

[linux-dvb] Setting PIDs in CVS driver 2001-06-22

2001-06-22 Thread Ralph Metzler
Klaus Schmidinger writes: > I noticed that in the latest CVS driver's dvb.c the SetPIDs() call > in tuning to the default channel (n-tv) is now done _before_ the > actual tuning, as opposed to previous driver versions where it > was done _after_ tuning. > > Does this mean that an applicatio

[linux-dvb] Re: CI-Cam and VDR 0.82

2001-06-22 Thread Axel Gruber
> I think this AND a driver who will work with more than one Card could work > for ALL possible configurations:) A better solution could not build, i > think. This would be realy great ! But some time ago Ralph sayed to me that they don´t plan to modify the CAM-things in the driver in the near

[linux-dvb] Re: CI-Cam and VDR 0.82

2001-06-22 Thread Andreas Share
>> Currently you would need two VDR machines for that, because the driver >> only supports one single CAM per machine :-( > >Also in Future it´s not a bad idea to implement a "VDR-COMUNICATION-LANGUAGE" so >2 or mor VDR systems can cumunicate togehter to split ther work. > >I have now 4 DVB-S CAR

[linux-dvb] [linux-dvb]Re: VDR 0.82 and Alphacrypt CI

2001-06-22 Thread Andreas Share
Same Problem hier today, but with an SE 4.7. But i have yesterday tried to use a second Card and testet an Aston CI, and Today i have had the same effect here. I must recompile the driver, i dont no what was going wrong. I using *not* the latest CVS driver A.Share - Original Message -

[linux-dvb] Re: VDR 0.82 and Alphacrypt CI

2001-06-22 Thread Henning Holtschneider
> After I successfully compiled VDR, I found it VERY slow and > irresponsive, and it didn't recognize my Alphacrypt module (with original, > [...] > Is there anything I can do? Unfortunately, there is nothing you can do at the moment. Some (or just the AlphaCrypt?) CI modules don't work at th

[linux-dvb] Re: AW: Re: Segmentation Faults using VDR 0.82 with latest CVS

2001-06-22 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Stefan Himpich wrote: > > >> I have one of the new Haupauge WinTVs, whicht seem to card version 2.1. > >> When I record something with VDR, i get an segmentation fault after some > >> time. My Message-Logfile shows nothing. > >> Is there anything I can do to find the source of the problem? Enable

[linux-dvb] Re: CI-Cam and VDR 0.82

2001-06-22 Thread Axel Gruber
> Currently you would need two VDR machines for that, because the driver > only supports one single CAM per machine :-( Also in Future it´s not a bad idea to implement a "VDR-COMUNICATION-LANGUAGE" so 2 or mor VDR systems can cumunicate togehter to split ther work. I have now 4 DVB-S CARD´s in

[linux-dvb] AW: Re: Segmentation Faults using VDR 0.82 with latest CVS

2001-06-22 Thread Stefan Himpich
>> I have one of the new Haupauge WinTVs, whicht seem to card version 2.1. >> When I record something with VDR, i get an segmentation fault after some >> time. My Message-Logfile shows nothing. >> Is there anything I can do to find the source of the problem? Enable >> Debugging/core files? > You

[linux-dvb] VDR 0.82 and Alphacrypt CI

2001-06-22 Thread Stephan Schreiber
Debian Potato CPU: K6/2+500 on P5A/128MB, Adaptec 2940 DVB Driver: 06/18/01 VDR Version: 0.82 Card: Siemens Fujitsu DVB-Cable (Telekom Net Munich) with CI and analog modules Kernel: 2.4.5-ac16, all necessary updates to debian are done (?) After I successfully compiled VDR, I found it VERY slo

[linux-dvb] Re: Problem with dtv_scan

2001-06-22 Thread Rolf Hakenes
Jean-Claude REPETTO schrieb: > > I also have tuning problems with my Hauppauge card, rev 1.3. The driver is > from CVS (16-06), and the DTV version is 1.1. I am using a LFS installation > with Linux kernel 2.4.4 on a Pentium 200 MMX with 64Mb RAM. > I have used the option -v4 to display more mess

[linux-dvb] Re: AW: Minimum System Requirements & Power Supply

2001-06-22 Thread Tony Godshall
May want to rerient case with power supply at top and since heat rises, you should get a natural convection current going. Hard drives probably need to be reoriented too since they don't usually want to be in a vertical direction. You'd probably still burn out power supply and hard drives and CP

[linux-dvb] AW: Re: MTV-Central

2001-06-22 Thread Jens Groth
Hello Klaus, > Comin' in just fine here. On my other receivers everything is OK (connected to the same feed). > Your channels.conf appears to be an older version (9 fields > instead of 10). Are you sure you are using the latest DVB driver > from the CVS and VDR 0.82? Currently I am using vdr 0.7

[linux-dvb] Setting PIDs in CVS driver 2001-06-22

2001-06-22 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
I noticed that in the latest CVS driver's dvb.c the SetPIDs() call in tuning to the default channel (n-tv) is now done _before_ the actual tuning, as opposed to previous driver versions where it was done _after_ tuning. Does this mean that an application should now also set the PIDs _before_ tuni

[linux-dvb] Anybody help with insmod of dvb0 device!!!

2001-06-22 Thread monstro
Hi, i had been had perfect skystar1 working as on Redhat 6.2 as on 6.0 but now i always get an error like this, when i make insmod to any of the drivers. insmod: a module named dmxdev already exists insmod: a module named dvb_demux already exists insmod: a module named dvb already exists SIOCSIF

[linux-dvb] Anybody help with insmod of dvb0 device!!!

2001-06-22 Thread monstro
Hi, i had been had perfect skystar1 working as on Redhat 6.2 as on 6.0 but now i always get an error like this, when i make insmod to any of the drivers. insmod: a module named dmxdev already exists insmod: a module named dvb_demux already exists insmod: a module named dvb already exists SIOCSIF

[linux-dvb] Re: CI-Cam and VDR 0.82

2001-06-22 Thread A. Share
> > >> So would it possible to use e.g. 2 Card´s with 2 Irdeto-CI´s (and 2 Abo-Cards;)) and record one Premiere-Channel while still looking an >>other? > >Currently you would need two VDR machines for that, because the driver >only supports one single CAM per machine :-( > >Klaus Thanks, so i hop

[linux-dvb] Re: AW: Minimum System Requirements & Power Supply

2001-06-22 Thread Christian Neumair
Thank you for your Tips :) So far, Christian Neumair PS: Bitte nächstes mal statt 'AW:' 'Re:' verwenden, auch, wenn's in den deutschen Übersetzungen der Mailproggies so vorgegeben ist :-( -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.

[linux-dvb] Re: CI-Cam and VDR 0.82

2001-06-22 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Andreas Share wrote: > > Hello, > > could it possible that VDR .82 will ignore the setting for the card-number who will >decrypt an Pay-TV Channel? I have testet with a default channel.conf (all cyrpted >channels on last card) an an Ci on the first Card. VDR will still Display all >channels.

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Jean-Claude REPETTO
- Original Message - From: Ralph Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Henning Holtschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Axel Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:27 PM Subject: [linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version > Henning Holtschneider writes: > > > > Th

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Ralph Metzler
Henning Holtschneider writes: > > > Thats why I'm asking. When you are finished with building in > > > support for the CI IR receiver, how do you access it ? lircd ? > > I think that there are other thinks wich have a much higher Priority ! > > > > - Channel Switching-Problem > > - ARM-RE

[linux-dvb] Re: Segmentation Faults using VDR 0.82 with latest CVS

2001-06-22 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
DVB net-lab wrote: > > Hi! > > I have one of the new Haupauge WinTVs, whicht seem to card version 2.1. > > When I record something with VDR, i get an segmentation fault after some > time. My Message-Logfile shows nothing. > > Is there anything I can do to find the source of the problem? Enable

[linux-dvb] Help! Mrouted working, multicast Ok, but .........

2001-06-22 Thread Ven
Hi to all, I have problem with mrouted, all working dvb, multicast, squid .. LAN - 10Mb and 100Mb 100Mb - 10.0.0.0, 194.141.27.0 10Mb - 194. .., 193..., 192 ... How to configure mrouted work only with 10.0.0.0 Tanks in advance. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PRO

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Henning Holtschneider
> > Thats why I'm asking. When you are finished with building in > > support for the CI IR receiver, how do you access it ? lircd ? > I think that there are other thinks wich have a much higher Priority ! > > - Channel Switching-Problem > - ARM-RESET´s > - Better CAM-Support Well, channel swi

[linux-dvb] Problem with dtv_scan

2001-06-22 Thread Jean-Claude REPETTO
I also have tuning problems with my Hauppauge card, rev 1.3. The driver is from CVS (16-06), and the DTV version is 1.1. I am using a LFS installation with Linux kernel 2.4.4 on a Pentium 200 MMX with 64Mb RAM. I have used the option -v4 to display more messages. Some transponders can't be synchro

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Axel Gruber
> Thats why I'm asking. When you are finished with building in > support for the CI IR receiver, how do you access it ? lircd ? I think that there are other thinks wich have a much higher Priority ! - Channel Switching-Problem - ARM-RESET´s - Better CAM-Support -- Info: To unsubscribe send

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Johannes Schoeller
> I always remove the complete DVB source tree after unloading the driver > because I have had problems with my CVS client or your server updating the > firmware binary files properly. When I do a complete "cvs checkout" > everything works fine. So, if there are no leftovers of your code on the >

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Ralph Metzler wrote: > > Deti Fliegl writes: > > Ralph Metzler wrote: > > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > ... it seems that encrypted channels are no longer displayed and some > > Encrypted channels work for me. I also can't receive encrypted channels with CVS driv

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Henning Holtschneider
> Maybe it should be mentioned that as a general rule after updating the > driver from CVS one should: > > 0) cd DVB/driver > 1) make rmmod > 2) make clean > 3) make insmod I always remove the complete DVB source tree after unloading the driver because I have had problems with my CVS client or yo

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Johannes Schoeller
> Hi, > with the latest CVS version my computer crashes after few seconds or minutes. > The previous version works fine. But the version before the previous one > froze my computer too. > > My card: Hauppauge WinTV DVB-s (dvb: AV7110 firm f0240009, rtsl b0250014, > vid 00010065, app 01010001) > M

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Thilo Wunderlich
> > > > with my old card + IR receiver on CI-module. With the new card it > > > > worked right away. Looks like the old IR receiver is broken ... > > > > > > ... it allready works with lircd. > > > > lirc does support the built in IR receiver in the CI-module ? > > No, I don't know how it

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Marcus O.C. Metzler
Maybe it should be mentioned that as a general rule after updating the driver from CVS one should: 0) cd DVB/driver 1) make rmmod 2) make clean 3) make insmod to ensure that you are really using the latest version and not some strange mix of old and new object files/kernel modules. Don't forge

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Philipp Zabel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: "Henning Holtschneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Ralph Metzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juni 2001 07:47 Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > > > Tun

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Ralph Metzler
Thilo Wunderlich writes: > > > Infra-red support will also follow shortly. I never got it to work > > > with my old card + IR receiver on CI-module. With the new card it > > > worked right away. Looks like the old IR receiver is broken ... > > > > ... it allready works with lircd. > > lir

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Ralph Metzler
Deti Fliegl writes: > Ralph Metzler wrote: > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > ... it seems that encrypted channels are no longer displayed and some Encrypted channels work for me. > 'Trying to vfree() bad address (38c0)' occur in the syslog. When does this occ

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Ralph Metzler
Stefan Schreinert writes: > Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2001 01:41 schrieb Ralph Metzler: > > Hi, > > > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > > > Tuning with the new card version 2.1 works without problems for me > > now. The main problem was that the new demodulator seems to

[linux-dvb] Segmentation Faults using VDR 0.82 with latest CVS

2001-06-22 Thread DVB net-lab
Hi! I have one of the new Haupauge WinTVs, whicht seem to card version 2.1. When I record something with VDR, i get an segmentation fault after some time. My Message-Logfile shows nothing. Is there anything I can do to find the source of the problem? Enable Debugging/core files? Stefan --

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Thilo Wunderlich
> > Infra-red support will also follow shortly. I never got it to work > > with my old card + IR receiver on CI-module. With the new card it > > worked right away. Looks like the old IR receiver is broken ... > > ... it allready works with lircd. lirc does support the built in IR receiver in the

[linux-dvb] Re: TV Linux Alliance

2001-06-22 Thread Martin Springer
"Jean-Claude Repetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have found this : > > TV Linux Alliance is a consortium of technology suppliers to cable, > satellite and telco network operators who wish to roll out digital set-top > boxes with interactive television applications. > > The Founders of the

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Stefan Schreinert
Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2001 01:41 schrieb Ralph Metzler: > Hi, > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > Tuning with the new card version 2.1 works without problems for me > now. The main problem was that the new demodulator seems to deliver > really confusing data to the MPEG dec

[linux-dvb] TV Linux Alliance

2001-06-22 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
I have found this : TV Linux Alliance is a consortium of technology suppliers to cable, satellite and telco network operators who wish to roll out digital set-top boxes with interactive television applications. The Founders of the TV Linux Alliance are working together to create a series of open

[linux-dvb] Re: Has anybody tried the SkyMedia 200/300?

2001-06-22 Thread Martin Springer
"Harry Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PentaMedia can support Linux Driver for Satellite PCI receiver > cards. Source code also available per request. Web site linux code > have source code + some object file now but available source code. What is the license of this source code? If it is G

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Joern Fiebelkorn
Ralph Metzler schrieb: > > Hi, > > the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > Tuning with the new card version 2.1 works without problems for me > now. The main problem was that the new demodulator seems to deliver > really confusing data to the MPEG decoder when it is not locked

[linux-dvb] Re: Strange output from /dev/video

2001-06-22 Thread Marcus Daniel
On Friday 22 June 2001 02:22, you wrote: > Marcus Daniel writes: > > On Thursday 21 June 2001 23:55, you wrote: > > > Maybe you are using the wrong color format or the SAA7146 is > > > delivering the wrong one? > > > I did not test all color formats of the SAA driver. There are > > > newer ve

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Deti Fliegl
Ralph Metzler wrote: > the current CVS version should fix several problems. ... it seems that encrypted channels are no longer displayed and some 'Trying to vfree() bad address (38c0)' occur in the syslog. Can anyone reproduce this behavior? Deti -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [E

[linux-dvb] Re: latest CVS version

2001-06-22 Thread Henning Holtschneider
> the current CVS version should fix several problems. > > Tuning with the new card version 2.1 works without problems for me > now. The main problem was that the new demodulator seems to deliver > really confusing data to the MPEG decoder when it is not locked to a > signal. The whole hardware de