> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Subject: [PATCH v7 01/13] arch/x86: Start renaming the rdt files to more
> generic names
>
> I guess the subject prefix for all those should be "arch/resctrl:" or so now.
Is "x86/resctrl" a better subject prefix?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
> From: Moger, Babu [mailto:babu.mo...@amd.com]
> Subject: [PATCH v7 11/13] arch/x86: Introduce QOS feature for AMD
> The specification for this feature is available at
> https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56375.pdf
> +bool cbm_validate_amd(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> From: Moger, Babu [mailto:babu.mo...@amd.com]
> >> I'm wondering: does that mean the tasks running with this closid
> >> directly access memory without cache? Is there any usage for this
> situation?
>
> Here is the detailed answer to your question from Doug(in CC).
>
> A closid with L3_MASK of
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pa...@ucw.cz]
> > rename Documentation/x86/{intel_rdt_ui.txt => resctrl_ui.txt} (99%)
>
> Rest of files in that directory use - as a separator; and maybe qos.txt would
> be a better name then this?
Actually a few other files in the directory use "_" as a separator (e
