On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:28:10AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 08:33 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > + vm = setup_vm(guest_test_system_off2, &source, &target);
> &g
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:05:18AM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:28:10AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 08:33 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > &
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:56:09PM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On 24 October 2024 17:44:49 CEST, Oliver Upton wrote:
> >IIUC, you're really wanting to 0x0 because there are hypervisors out
> >there that violate the final spec and *only* accept this value.
> >
>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 03:48:26PM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On 24 October 2024 14:54:41 CEST, Miguel Luis wrote:
> >Perhaps spec. F.b. could be accommodated by first invoking SYSTEM_OFF2 with
> >PSCI_1_3_OFF_TYPE_HIBERNATE_OFF and checking its return value in case of a
> >fallback to a
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 18:15:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The PSCI v1.3 spec (https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022)
> adds support for a SYSTEM_OFF2 function enabling a HIBERNATE_OFF state
> which is analogous to ACPI S4. This will allow hosting environments to
> determine that a gues
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> +static void guest_test_system_off2(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret;
> +
> + /* assert that SYSTEM_OFF2 is discoverable */
> + GUEST_ASSERT(psci_features(PSCI_1_3_FN_SYSTEM_OFF2) &
> + BIT(PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE
Hi David,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:57PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> @@ -392,6 +403,32 @@ static int kvm_psci_1_x_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
> minor)
> break;
> }
> break;
> + case PSCI_1_3_FN_SYSTEM_OFF2:
> + kvm_psci
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
Please, add changelogs to your patches.
What we really need here is the detail on *why* we can just bump the
PSCI version like this, i.e. no new required ABI. On top of that, you
could mention that KVM has m
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:13:03AM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On 24 October 2024 21:57:38 CEST, Oliver Upton wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:56:09PM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On 24 October 2024 17:44:49 CEST, Oliver Upton
> >> wrote:
> >>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 18:15:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The PSCI v1.3 spec (https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022)
> adds support for a SYSTEM_OFF2 function enabling a HIBERNATE_OFF state
> which is analogous to ACPI S4. This will allow hosting environments to
> determine that a gues
10 matches
Mail list logo
