Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] netconsole: Make boolean comparison consistent

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 04:50:18AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > Convert the current state assignment to use explicit boolean conversion, > making the code more robust and easier to read. This change adds a > double-negation operator to ensure consistent boolean conversion as > suggested by Paolo[1]

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netconsole: add task name to extra data fields

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 04:50:22AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > This is the core patch for this whole patchset. Add support for > including the current task's name in netconsole's extra data output. > This adds a new append_taskname() function that writes the task name > (from current->comm) into t

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Spell out the TAB role in enforcement decisions

2025-03-04 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:43:13 -0700 Shuah wrote: > > Without an explanation of the intent, the CoC and TAB would appear more > > opaque, especially given the tags present on v1 that shows the patch has > > been discussed behind closed doors. > > No decisions are made behind the closed doors. As

Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] netconsole: add task name to extra data fields

2025-03-04 Thread Paolo Abeni
On 2/25/25 2:11 PM, Breno Leitao wrote: > Ack. I will remove the check then, and check if the UDP stack has been > initialized before calling netpoll helpers. > > What is the best way to make sure taht the UDP stack has been > initialized? [brosers!] Sorry for the latency. My statement was intend

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] netconsole: Add taskname sysdata support

2025-03-04 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni : On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 04:50:16 -0800 you wrote: > This patchset introduces a new feature to the netconsole extradata > subsystem that enables the inclusion of the current task's name in the > sysdata output of netconsole

Re: [PATCH v2] docs: livepatch: move text out of code block

2025-03-04 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2025-02-27 17:39:29, Vincenzo MEZZELA wrote: > Part of the documentation text is included in the readelf output code > block. Hence, split the code block and move the affected text outside. > > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo MEZZELA JFYI, the patch has been comitted into livepatching.git, branch

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Spell out the TAB role in enforcement decisions

2025-03-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Shuah, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 12:48:12PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > Updates to clarify and spell out the TAB role in approving and overturning > enforcement measures for Code of Conduct violations. As with any technical change, I think it would help reviewers if the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Spell out the TAB role in enforcement decisions

2025-03-04 Thread Shuah
On 3/4/25 13:09, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Shuah, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 12:48:12PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: Updates to clarify and spell out the TAB role in approving and overturning enforcement measures for Code of Conduct violations. As with any technical change

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Spell out the TAB role in enforcement decisions

2025-03-04 Thread Shuah
On 3/4/25 14:55, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:43:13 -0700 Shuah wrote: Without an explanation of the intent, the CoC and TAB would appear more opaque, especially given the tags present on v1 that shows the patch has been discussed behind closed doors. No decisions are made beh

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 7/8] net: check for driver support in netmem TX

2025-03-04 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:53:44 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > Upper devices and BPF access is covered I think, by the skbuff checks. > > But I think we missed adding a check in validate_xmit_skb() to protect > > the xmit paths of HW|virt drivers. You can try to add a TC rule which > > forwards all traf

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/8] net: devmem: Implement TX path

2025-03-04 Thread Pranjal Shrivastava
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:12:04AM +, Mina Almasry wrote: > int mp_dmabuf_devmem_init(struct page_pool *pool) > diff --git a/net/core/devmem.h b/net/core/devmem.h > index 946f2e015746..67168aae5e5b 100644 > --- a/net/core/devmem.h > +++ b/net/core/devmem.h > @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ struct net_devmem

Re: [PATCH 01/12] kconfig: implement CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL for Usermode Linux

2025-03-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 8:00 PM Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > userprogs sometimes need access to UAPI headers. > This is currently not possible for Usermode Linux, as UM is only > a pseudo architecture built on top of a regular architecture and does > not have its own UAPI. > Instead use the UAPI he

[PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Spell out the TAB role in enforcement decisions

2025-03-04 Thread Shuah Khan
Updates to clarify and spell out the TAB role in approving and overturning enforcement measures for Code of Conduct violations. Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda Acked-by: Steven Rostedt Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- .../process/code-of-conduct-

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/8] net: add get_netmem/put_netmem support

2025-03-04 Thread Mina Almasry
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 4:20 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:29:13 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:38 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 04:12:02 + Mina Almasry wrote: > > > > static inline void __skb_frag_ref(skb_frag_t *frag) > > >