On 9/25/2024 7:12 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024, Xin Li wrote:
You mean the following patch set, right?
Yep, and presumably the KVM support as well:
I assume it's close to KVM upstreaming criteria :)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240219074733.122080-1-weijiang.y...@i
On 24/09/2024 15:19, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:08:31PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> Most of these submaintainers have their own trees where they stage patches,
>> sending pull requests to the main SoC tree. These trees are usually, but
>> not
>> -always, listed
Patches for SoCs are expected to be picked up by SoC submaintainers.
The main SoC maintainers should be addressed only in few cases.
Rewrite the section about maintainer handling to document above
expectation.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Linus Walleij
Cc: Alexandre Belloni
Cc: Will
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024, Xin Li wrote:
> > > MSR_IA32_FRED_SSP0 is an alias of the CET MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP and likely to
> > > be used in the same way as FRED RSP0, i.e., host FRED SSP0 _should_ be
> > > restored in arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(). However as of today Linux
> > > has no plan to utilize
