On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 07:42:24PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Add a section to netdev maintainer doc encouraging reviewers
> to chime in on the mailing list.
>
> The questions about "when is it okay to share feedback"
> keep coming up (most recently at netconf) and the answer
> is "pretty much
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:44:17 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> I notice that clang-format reflows that example to:
>
> const void *a;
> void *const b;
> void **const c;
> void *const *const d;
> int strcmp(const char *a, const char *b);
>
> ...but someone more clang-format savvy th
Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 05:57:38PM CEST, a...@arndb.de wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 11, 2023, at 17:04, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Could you provide a cover letter for the set please?
>
>Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] remove final .ndo_do_ioctl references
>
>The .ndo_do_ioctl() netdev operation used to be how one communi
On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 13:50 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:44:17 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > I notice that clang-format reflows that example to:
> >
> > const void *a;
> > void *const b;
> > void **const c;
> > void *const *const d;
> > int strcmp(c
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> The linux-distros list relaxed their rules to try to adapt better to
> how the Linux kernel works. Let's update the Coordination part to
> explain why and when to contact them or not to and how to avoid trouble
> in the future.
>
> Link: https://www.open
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:48 PM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Do older versions of clang-format ignore entries
> they don't understand?
Sadly, no, that is the reason we keep it at the minimum.
However, I just took a look again at it, and I see that such support
was added to LLVM 12, the `--Wno-error=un
Hi all,
Thank you (especially Willy) for your effort on this.
Out of the 3 paragraphs, the first one looks good to me as-is, but for
the last two I propose the slightly edited versions below.
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 04:04:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> +Please note that the respective polici
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:51:22PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you (especially Willy) for your effort on this.
>
> Out of the 3 paragraphs, the first one looks good to me as-is, but for
> the last two I propose the slightly edited versions below.
>
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Jiri, does your Acked-by still stand with these adjustment ? If so, I'll
> resend the updated version today or this week-end, as time permits.
As it doesn't change the spirit but pretty much just improves the wording,
my Ack still holds.
Thanks again,
