On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/fred.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/fred.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index ..9f57e7b91f7e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/fred.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +..
On 02/10/2023 16:09, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:38:14 +0100
> Christian Loehle wrote:
>
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ of ftrace. Here is a list of some of the key files:
A few extra pages may be allocated to accommodate buffer management
meta-data. If the last
Mark Brown writes:
> While some subsystems do typically have very fast turnaround times on
> review this is far from standard over the kernel and is likely to set
> unrealistic expectations for submitters. Tell submitters to expect 2-3
> weeks instead, this will cover more of the kernel.
>
> Sig
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:33:34AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I was hoping to see some more comments on this; it is a fairly
> significant change in the expectations we put on our reviewers. Oh
> well, I've applied it. I wonder if we should add a note saying to look
> at the maintainer prof
There has been a repeated misunderstanding about what the hardware embargo
list is for. Clarify the language in the process so that it is clear
that only fixes are coordinated. There is explicitly no prenotification
process. The list members are also expected to keep total radio silence
during emba
