On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 06:33:34PM +0100, Markus Heiser wrote:
>
> Am 07.02.19 um 17:18 schrieb Mike Rapoport:
> >>>Does checkpatch checks the kernel-doc parts at all?
> >>No. I guess there are to many places to fail / to hard to put someone in
> >>charge. E.g. if you do include a single kernel-
* Remove comments mentioning bootmem
* Extend "DOC: memblock overview"
* Add kernel-doc comments for several more functions
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport
---
The patch is against the current -mm tree which seems the best route for it
as well :)
mm/memblock.c | 60 +++
It clarifies that the DMA description pointer returned by
`dmaengine_prep_*` function should not be used after submission.
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga
---
Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/
Remove KMS cleanup task from documentation solved by patchset
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/54310/
Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura
---
Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index cda4a37a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:59:00PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap
>
> Fix markup warnings in cgroup-v2.rst:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst:1509: WARNING: Block quote ends
> without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst:1511: W
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:35:39 -0200
Shayenne Moura wrote:
> Remove KMS cleanup task from documentation solved by patchset
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/54310/
>
> Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura
This seems like a worthy change, but Documentation/gpu is managed by the
DRM maintainers.
Remove KMS cleanup task from documentation solved by patchset
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/54310/
Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura
---
Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index cda4a37a
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 14:40:28 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > - I don't think this should be a top-level directory full of docs; the top
> > level is already rather overpopulated. At worst, we should create an
> > arch/ directory for architecture-specific docs.
>
> We currently have arch
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:29:31 -0800
Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/2/19 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:04:16PM -0800, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
> >> - If no *function* if specified, the documentaion fo
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:45:47 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote:
> * Remove comments mentioning bootmem
> * Extend "DOC: memblock overview"
> * Add kernel-doc comments for several more functions
>
> ...
>
> @@ -1400,6 +1413,19 @@ phys_addr_t __init
> memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size,
> r
10 matches
Mail list logo