DMA Engine Documentation: TX Descriptor and Submission

Hi, I have a new question concerning documentation. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/dmaengine/client.html >From this document it is not really clear, at least to me, if clients can consider valid the `struct dma_async_tx_descriptor` after submission to the DMA engine. Client

Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks

Hi Rob, On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 4:00 AM Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema > > > documents and validating dts files using

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl.txt: Remove outdated information

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:38 PM Ramon Fried wrote: > Returning -EAGAIN is no longer supported by pin_config_group_set() > since ad42fc6c8479 ("pinctrl: rip out the direct pinconf API") > > Remove the relevant section from the documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried Patch applied! Yours,

Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: fix kernel-doc warnings

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 18:21:42 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix kernel-doc warnings in drivers/mtd/nand/raw: > > ../drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:420: warning: Function parameter or > member 'chip' not described in 'nand_fill_oob' > ../drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_bbt.c:17

Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks

Hi Rob, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring wrote: > This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema > documents and validating dts files using the binding schema. > > Check DT binding schema documents: > make dt_binding_check > > Build dts files and check using DT bindi

Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: fix kernel-doc warnings

Hi Randy, Boris Brezillon wrote on Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:43:38 +0100: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 18:21:42 -0800 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > From: Randy Dunlap > > > > Fix kernel-doc warnings in drivers/mtd/nand/raw: With the prefix changed to "mtd: rawnand:" Acked-by: Miquel Raynal Thanks, Miq

Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema > > documents and validating dts files using the binding schema. > > > > Check DT binding schema docum

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 059/258] x86/resctrl: Fixup the user-visible strings

From: Babu Moger [ Upstream commit 723f1a0dd8e26a7523ba068204bee11c95ded38d ] Fix the messages in rdt_last_cmd_printf() and rdt_last_cmd_puts() to make them more meaningful and consistent. [ bp: s/cpu/CPU/; s/mem\W/memory ] Signed-off-by: Babu Moger Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andrew

Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:59 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 4:00 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > > This adds the build infrastructure for

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 068/304] x86/resctrl: Fixup the user-visible strings

From: Babu Moger [ Upstream commit 723f1a0dd8e26a7523ba068204bee11c95ded38d ] Fix the messages in rdt_last_cmd_printf() and rdt_last_cmd_puts() to make them more meaningful and consistent. [ bp: s/cpu/CPU/; s/mem\W/memory ] Signed-off-by: Babu Moger Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andrew

Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks

Hi Rob, On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:35 PM Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema > > > documents and validating dts files using

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 059/258] x86/resctrl: Fixup the user-visible strings

Hi Sasha, On 1/28/2019 7:56 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Babu Moger > > [ Upstream commit 723f1a0dd8e26a7523ba068204bee11c95ded38d ] > > Fix the messages in rdt_last_cmd_printf() and rdt_last_cmd_puts() to > make them more meaningful and consistent. It is not clear to me why this patch is co

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] psi: introduce state_mask to represent stalled psi states

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:15:16PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > The psi monitoring patches will need to determine the same states as > record_times(). To avoid calculating them twice, maintain a state mask > that can be consulted cheaply. Do this in a separate patch to keep the > churn in the

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] psi: rename psi fields in preparation for psi trigger addition

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:15:17PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > Renaming psi_group structure member fields used for calculating psi > totals and averages for clear distinction between them and trigger-related > fields that will be added next. > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan Acked-by:

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] psi: introduce psi monitor

One thought on the v3 delta that I missed earlier: On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:15:18PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > +/* > + * psi_update_work represents slowpath accounting part while psi_group_change > + * represents hotpath part. There are two potential races between them: > + * 1. Changes

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] psi: introduce psi monitor

Hi Suren, When I review first time, it was rather hard to understand due to naming so below comments are mostly cleanup or minor. I'm not strong against if you don't think it's helpful. Feel free to select parts. Thanks. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:15:18PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > Psi m

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] psi: introduce psi monitor

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:54 PM Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi Suren, > > When I review first time, it was rather hard to understand due to naming > so below comments are mostly cleanup or minor. > I'm not strong against if you don't think it's helpful. > Feel free to select parts. > > Thanks. Thanks