Hi Greg,
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:37:00 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:47:44AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Document sysfs files/directories/symlinks exposed by the I3C subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - new patch
Hi Greg,
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:36:42 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:56:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:47:41 +0200
> > > Boris Brezillon wrot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:10:36AM +0530, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote:
> Add support for pwm HW driver which has only capture functionality.
> This helps to implement the PWM based Tachometer driver which reads
> the PWM output signals from electronic fans.
>
> PWM Tachometer captures the period and d
Hi Gustavo,
On April 27, 2018, 4:57 p.m. Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Add MSI-X support and update driver documentation accordingly.
>
> Add new driver parameter to allow interruption type selection.
>
> Modify the Legacy/MSI/MSI-X test process, by:
> - Add and use a specific register located in a
Hi Alan,
On 30/04/2018 16:35, Alan Douglas wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On April 27, 2018, 4:57 p.m. Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
>> Add MSI-X support and update driver documentation accordingly.
>>
>> Add new driver parameter to allow interruption type selection.
>>
>> Modify the Legacy/MSI/MSI-X test pr
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:50:04 +1000
NeilBrown wrote:
> This patch simplifies the interface for first/next iteration and
> simplifies the code, while maintaining complete backward
> compatability. Now:
>
> - if ->start() is given a pos of zero, it should return an iterator
> placed at the start
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:07:27 +0800
"dongbo (E)" wrote:
> From: Dong Bo
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Bo
> ---
Hi Dong Bo,
The patch is corrupted, please resend and also include a commit log,
something as simple as "Update vfio_add_group_dev description to match
the current API" would be fine. Tha
I like this series overall, thanks! No objections from me. One thing I
noted, though:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> if (param->min && *param->min > val) {
> if (clamp) {
> val = *param->min;
> +
