On Mon 30-10-17 14:36:39, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> > The thing is that the hierarchical approach (as in v8), which are you
> > pushing,
> > has it's own limitations, which we've discussed in details earlier. There
> > are
> > reasons why v12 is diffe
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:49:14 +0200
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> - Use the same file name in the explanation and in the example (conex.c vs
> sonixj.c)
> - Add a missing ':' in a :ref: tag which leads to incorrect Shpinx output
> - Add some missing ',' and ';'
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:19:18PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Related, there was also a script to do reStructuredText lint style
>> checks in addition to the kernel-doc checks using make CHECK and
>> C=1. See http://mid.mail-archive.com/87h98quc1w.fsf
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:02:51 +0530
Vinod Koul wrote:
> So here is the conversion of the dmaengine documents form txt files to rst
> format. Not much functional change but somehow git detects only two renames
> (possibly due to added indent to make new format happier)
Overall this looks pretty go
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:16:14AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:02:51 +0530
> Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > So here is the conversion of the dmaengine documents form txt files to rst
> > format. Not much functional change but somehow git detects only two renames
> > (possibly
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> I feel that taking this argument to its logical conclusion leads to
> never exporting any GPIOs to userspace and doing everything in the
> kernel.
That is very much how I feel about things anyways.
In a recent presentation:
https://dflund.
On 10/27/2017 10:05 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:03:41PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>
The nack is for three reasons:
(1) unfair comparison of root mem cgroup usage to bias against that mem
cgroup
On Tue 31-10-17 15:17:11, peter enderborg wrote:
> On 10/27/2017 10:05 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:03:41PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >>
> The nack is for three reasons:
>
> (1) unfair comparison of r
> +
> +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct oom_control
> *oc)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> +
> + oc->chosen_memcg = NULL;
> + oc->chosen_points = 0;
> +
> + /*
> +* The oom_score is calculated for leaf memory cgroups (including
> +
On 10/31/2017 03:34 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-10-17 15:17:11, peter enderborg wrote:
>> On 10/27/2017 10:05 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:03:41PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> The nack is for three rea
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its
> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during
> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason.
>
> Also make it avoi
On Tue 31-10-17 08:04:19, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > +
> > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
> > oom_control *oc)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> > +
> > + oc->chosen_memcg = NULL;
> > + oc->chosen_points = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > +
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its
>> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during
>> system suspend unless they need
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:04:19AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > +
> > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
> > oom_control *oc)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> > +
> > + oc->chosen_memcg = NULL;
> > + oc->chosen_points = 0;
> > +
> > +
Hello Radim,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:18:59PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-10-23 17:44-0700, Eduardo Valentin:
> > Currently, the existing qspinlock implementation will fallback to
> > test-and-set if the hypervisor has not set the PV_UNHALT flag.
>
> Where have you detected the main sourc
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:04:19AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> > +
>> > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
>> > oom_control *oc)
>> > +{
>> > + struct mem_cgroup *iter;
>> > +
>> > + oc->chosen_m
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:04:19AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
> >> > oom_control *oc)
> >> >
On Tue 31-10-17 16:29:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-10-17 08:04:19, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > +
> > > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
> > > oom_control *oc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> > > +
> > > + oc->chosen_memcg = NULL;
> > > +
On Tue 31-10-17 20:06:44, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-10-17 16:29:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 31-10-17 08:04:19, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +static void select_victim_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct
> > > > oom_control *oc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct mem_cgroup *
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I'm not ignoring them, I have stated that we need the ability to protect
> > important cgroups on the system without oom disabling all attached
> > processes. If that is implemented as a memory.oom_score_adj with the same
> > semantics as /proc/pid/
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:27:45AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Make the PCI bus type take DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND into account in its
> system-wide PM callbacks and make sure that all code that should not
> run in parallel with pci_pm_runtime_resume() is executed
21 matches
Mail list logo
