On Mon 2017-09-18 22:43:40, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/17/2017 07:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way,
> even if it was made optional?
> >>>
> >>> Of course, we can make LED timing accurate down to microseco
Hi!
> >> However only if following conditions are met:
> >> - force feedback driver supports gpio driven devices
> >> - there is sample application in tools/input showing how to
> >> setup gpio driven vibrate device with use of ff interface
> >> - it will be possible to setup vibrate interval wi
> >>> I'd leave the decision to the user. We could add a note to the
> >>> Documentation/leds/ledtrig-transient.txt that force feedback interface
> >>> should be preferable choice for driving vibrate devices.
> >>> However only if following conditions are met:
> >>
> >> What I meant is that it is m
At DVB, we have, at some structs, things like (see
struct dvb_demux_feed, at dvb_demux.h):
union {
struct dmx_ts_feed ts;
struct dmx_section_feed sec;
} feed;
union {
dmx_ts_cb ts;
dmx_section_cb sec;
Hi,
On 09/20/2017 01:15 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2017-09-18 22:43:40, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/17/2017 07:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way,
>> even if it was made optional?
>
> Of cours
This patch series comes after a previous patchset with DVB fixes.
both series are there at:
https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=dvb-fixes-v3
It is mainly focused on improving the DVB kAPI documentation, making
it (finally!) in sync with the current implementation. It also c
At DVB, we have, at some structs, things like (see
struct dvb_demux_feed, at dvb_demux.h):
union {
struct dmx_ts_feed ts;
struct dmx_section_feed sec;
} feed;
union {
dmx_ts_cb ts;
dmx_section_cb sec;
On 09/19/2017 11:07 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> On 09/19/2017 12:29 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Jacek Anaszewski
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On 09/17/2017 08:22 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
On 09/20/2017 01:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'd leave the decision to the user. We could add a note to the
> Documentation/leds/ledtrig-transient.txt that force feedback interface
> should be preferable choice for driving vibrate devices.
> However only if following conditions are
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:14:05AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 15-09-17 08:23:01, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:58:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 14-09-17 09:05:48, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:40:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrot
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 01:54:48PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> > > > > But then you just enforce a structural restriction on your
> > > > > configuration
> > > > > because
> > > > > root
> > > > > / \
> > > > >AD
> > > >
11 matches
Mail list logo
