Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-smbus: add support for HOST NOTIFY

2016-06-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Benjamin, > this is mostly a resubmission of the v6 with the acks, tested-by and few typos > here and there. I actually reviewed v6 but got an NMI so writing the mails fell through the cracks :( Sorry about that! Good news is that the code is fine from my point of view, some documentation upda

Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] i2c: add a protocol parameter to the alert callback

2016-06-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:03:02PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > .alert() is meant to be generic, but there is currently no way > for the device driver to know which protocol generated the alert. > Add a parameter in .alert() to help the device driver to understand > what is given in data. >

Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support

2016-06-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol > b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol > index 6012b12..4e07848 100644 > --- a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol > +++ b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol > @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ alerting device's address. > > [S] [HostAddr] [Wr] A [DevAddr] A [DataLow]

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] i2c: i801: add support of Host Notify

2016-06-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:03:04PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > The i801 chip can handle the Host Notify feature since ICH 3 as mentioned > in > http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/82801ca-io-controller-hub-3-datasheet.pdf > > Enable the functionality unconditionally and propagat

RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-06-05 Thread Du, Changbin
Thanks, Machek, This patch has already been dropped. > On Tue 2016-05-03 11:04:24, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > > From: "Du, Changbin" > > > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > > name by setti