Re: [PATCHv10 2/4] ARM: dts: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM EDAC entries

2016-02-11 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:26:22PM -0600, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Thor Thayer > > Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support > the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon > an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly. > h

Re: [PATCHv10 1/4] EDAC, altera: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM EDAC Support

2016-02-11 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:26:21PM -0600, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Thor Thayer > > Adding L2 Cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC support for the > Altera SoCs using the EDAC device model. The SDRAM > controller is using the Memory Controller model. > > Each type of ECC is individuall

Re: [PATCH] documentation: add kernel-dot.emacs.txt

2016-02-11 Thread Geyslan G. Bem
Hello, ping... 2016-01-27 19:51 GMT-03:00 Geyslan G. Bem : > This patch adds kernel-dot-emacs.txt (elisp) which deliver best > indentation, comments and white space highlighting functionalities. > > This also changes the CodingStyle and 00-INDEX files by referencing > the new kernel-dot-emacs. > >

Re: [RFC] A first shot at asciidoc-based formatted docs

2016-02-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Keith Packard wrote: > I think it should be pretty easy to hack asciidoc to add diversions to > hold TOC contents while generating the rest of the doc and then replay > the diversion into the final document. One of the chief complaints with the current pipeline (and some of t

Re: [RFC] A first shot at asciidoc-based formatted docs

2016-02-11 Thread Keith Packard
Jonathan Corbet writes: > asciidoc->HTML on its own isn't viable, I think; we do have people wanting > other formats. Though one might well ask when somebody last successfully > generated PDF...maybe it's not worth the trouble. I would like epub > someday... I'm hopeful that I can hack up asci

Re: [RFC] A first shot at asciidoc-based formatted docs

2016-02-11 Thread Keith Packard
Jani Nikula writes: > One of the chief complaints with the current pipeline (and some of the > proposals) has been the need to install lots of tools with lots of > dependencies. I would like to avoid the need to install bleeding edge > tools and stick to what's already widely available in distros

Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component

2016-02-11 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On 6 February 2016 at 04:04, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > From: Pratik Patel > > This driver adds support for the STM CoreSight IP block, allowing any > system compoment (HW or SW) to log and aggregate messages via a > single entity. > > The CoreSight STM exposes an application defined number of channe

Re: [PATCH v9 04/13] task_isolation: add initial support

2016-02-11 Thread Chris Metcalf
On 01/30/2016 04:11 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote: On 01/27/2016 07:28 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:45:04PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote: You asked what happens if nohz_full= is given as well, which is a

patch to fix small grammar error

2016-02-11 Thread Justin Keller
Hello, I have a small patch to the memory-hotplug documentation. One line adds a comma, and the other line adds an and. Justin Keller --- Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt.orig 2016-02-11 11:21:22.0 -0500 +++ Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt 2016-02-11 11:23:08.0 -0500 @@ -88,9 +

Re: [PATCH v8 04/14] task_isolation: add initial support

2016-02-11 Thread Chris Metcalf
On 01/28/2016 11:38 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:40:29PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: On 10/21/2015 12:12 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: +/* + * This routine controls whether we can enable task-isolation

Re: [PATCH v16 0/6] Device Tree support for FPGA programming

2016-02-11 Thread atull
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, at...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Alan Tull > > v16 Refactors the FPGA Area and FPGA Bus into single thing called an > FPGA Region and eliminates using simple-bus. I'm using the word > "region" as it's a term is used in the literature of both the major > FPGA manufa

Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller.

2016-02-11 Thread Parav Pandit
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Haggai Eran wrote: > > There is indeed an effort to backport the latest RDMA subsystem modules to > older kernels, and it would be preferable to be able to introduce new > resources through these modules. Right. There is hardly 10 to 20 lines of code that allows to

Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller.

2016-02-11 Thread Parav Pandit
Hi Tejun, (Sending again as by mistake previous mail was non plain text, sorry about that). So based on your comments, Haggai's comments below and past experience, I will spin v6.o I have made changes, and testing them. I am likely to post during coming long weekend. I have simplified many piece

Re: [PATCH v16 0/6] Device Tree support for FPGA programming

2016-02-11 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, atull wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, at...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > >> From: Alan Tull >> >> v16 Refactors the FPGA Area and FPGA Bus into single thing called an >> FPGA Region and eliminates using simple-bus. I'm using the word >> "region" as it's a term is

Re: [PATCH v16 0/6] Device Tree support for FPGA programming

2016-02-11 Thread atull
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, atull wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, at...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > > > >> From: Alan Tull > >> > >> v16 Refactors the FPGA Area and FPGA Bus into single thing called an > >> FPGA Region and eliminates using simple-

Re: [PATCH v16 0/6] Device Tree support for FPGA programming

2016-02-11 Thread atull
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, atull wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, atull wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, at...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > > > > > >> From: Alan Tull > > >> > > >> v16 Refactors the FPGA Area and FPGA Bus into single thing call

[PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about Reviewed-by tags

2016-02-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
As is now common in a lot of organization having an internal code review process (be it through Gerritt or other tools), patches extracted from this review process and submitted to public mailing-lists will have pre-existing Reviewed-by tags. Add a note about why these tags exists, and what a maint

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about Reviewed-by tags

2016-02-11 Thread Anup Patel
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > As is now common in a lot of organization having an internal code review > process (be it through Gerritt or other tools), patches extracted from > this review process and submitted to public mailing-lists will have > pre-existing Reviewed

Re: [PATCH v2] hpet: drop stale link

2016-02-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:05:01AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Looks like the HPET spec at intel.com got moved. > It isn't hard to find so drop the link, just mention > the revision assumed. > > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Changes from v1: