> I have a lot of other things to work on, of much greater interest (to me.)
This is fine.
Thanks for your feedback.
>>> Personally I see no value in such statistics.
>>
>> Do they indicate any code smells eventually?
>
> I have no idea what you mean, sorry.
How do you think about to take ano
Hello Markus,
On lun., 2016-07-25 at 18:19 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would you like to support the renaming of a label like "error_out1"
> >> (in the function "ks7010_upload_firmware" for example)?
> >
> > They should be renamed too. Anything using numbers instead of explicit
>
> Inte
>> Would you like to support the renaming of a label like "error_out1"
>> (in the function "ks7010_upload_firmware" for example)?
>
> They should be renamed too. Anything using numbers instead of explicit
Interesting …
> Anything using numbers instead of explicit labels should be updated.
Woul
Hi Markus,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:11:53 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> How do you generally think about jump label renaming?
> >
> > Renaming from "out0:", "out1:" etc to something meaningful, yes.
>
> I suggest to take another look at such identifiers.
>
> Would you like to support the r
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=92d21ac74a9e3c09b0b01c764e530657e4c85c49#n4326
>
> "#goto labels aren't indented, allow a single space however"
>
> Can't be clearer :-)
Should such information from a comment in this script be also
