On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 17:29 +0200, Markus Heiser wrote:
> > This has the same problem as all the other versions proposed here -
> > if you have
> >
> > enum foo {
> > X,
> >
> > Y,
> > };
> >
> > (note the blank line)
> >
> > you'll get
> >
> > warning: Enum value ' ' not described in enum 'fo
> Am 16.06.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Johannes Berg :
>
> Hi Markus,
>
>> The parser part is same state machine as the the perl one … with same
>> problems ;)
>
> :-)
>
>> Problem here; function process_proto_type() concatenates the striped
>> lines of declaration without any whitespace. A one-line
Hi Markus,
> The parser part is same state machine as the the perl one … with same
> problems ;)
:-)
> Problem here; function process_proto_type() concatenates the striped
> lines of declaration without any whitespace. A one-liner of::
>
> struct something {
> struct foo
> bar
> Am 06.06.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Johannes Berg :
>
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the long CC list, wasn't sure who really feels like they
> understand this script anymore ... Markus, I think you had a rewrite of
> the script in python?
Hi Johannes, hi Mauro, (Jon)
sorry for my late reply. Yes I have
>
> [PATCH] be sure that multiline definitions will be properly espaced
>
> When handling comments from structs with multiple lines, like:
> /**
>* struct something
>* @very_long_member_name: abcde
>*/
> struct something {
> struct
> this_is_a_ve
Em Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:12:30 +0200
Johannes Berg escreveu:
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:59 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > A trivial "fix" would be to use just one line for the struct field :-
> > )
>
> Sure, we did this, but it makes checkpatch unhappy. We have a
> relatively long
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:59 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> A trivial "fix" would be to use just one line for the struct field :-
> )
Sure, we did this, but it makes checkpatch unhappy. We have a
relatively long struct name, a relatively long member name, and then
it's also an array so yo
Em Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:28:34 +0200
Johannes Berg escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the long CC list, wasn't sure who really feels like they
> understand this script anymore ... Markus, I think you had a rewrite of
> the script in python?
>
> If you have something like this:
>
> /**
> * struct
Hi,
Apologies for the long CC list, wasn't sure who really feels like they
understand this script anymore ... Markus, I think you had a rewrite of
the script in python?
If you have something like this:
/**
* struct something
* @very_long_member_name: abcde
*/
struct something {
struct
