On 03/20/2018 05:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> ASAIK for v2, when cpuset.cpus is empty, cpuset.effective_cpus will show
>> all the cpus available from the parent. It is a different behavior from
>> v1. So do we still need a cpus
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> ASAIK for v2, when cpuset.cpus is empty, cpuset.effective_cpus will show
> all the cpus available from the parent. It is a different behavior from
> v1. So do we still need a cpuset.cpus_available?
Heh, you're right. Let's for
On 03/20/2018 04:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Waiman.
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:51:20AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+ It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually allowed to be
+ used by tasks within the current cgroup. It is a subset of
+ "cpuset.cpus". Its value will be a
Hello, Waiman.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:51:20AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> + It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually allowed to be
> >> + used by tasks within the current cgroup. It is a subset of
> >> + "cpuset.cpus". Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug
> >> + events.
> > Can
On 03/19/2018 11:59 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Waiman.
>
> This looks great. A couple nitpicks below.
>
>> + 5-3. Cpuset
>> + 5.3-1. Cpuset Interface Files
> Can we put cpuset below pid? It feels weird to break up cpu, memory
> and io as they represent the three major resources and a
Hello, Waiman.
This looks great. A couple nitpicks below.
> + 5-3. Cpuset
> + 5.3-1. Cpuset Interface Files
Can we put cpuset below pid? It feels weird to break up cpu, memory
and io as they represent the three major resources and are in a
similar fashion.
> + cpuset.effective_cpus
