On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> To be honest, I fail to understand this patch. At least after a quick glance,
> I will try to read it again tomorrow but so far I do not even understand the
> desired semantics wrt signals/ptrace.
>
> On 11/30, Roman Gushchin wrote:
On 11/30, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> void recalc_sigpending(void)
> {
> if (!recalc_sigpending_tsk(current) && !freezing(current) &&
> - !klp_patch_pending(current))
> + !klp_patch_pending(current) && !cgroup_task_frozen(current))
I must have missed something... but shouldn'
On 11/30, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> +void cgroup_enter_frozen(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->frozen) {
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
> + current->frozen = true;
> + cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
> + cg
To be honest, I fail to understand this patch. At least after a quick glance,
I will try to read it again tomorrow but so far I do not even understand the
desired semantics wrt signals/ptrace.
On 11/30, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> @@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ static inline int signal_pending_state(long state
