On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 8:25 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> Hi Rong,
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:20:02PM -0700, Rong Xu wrote:
> > Thanks to all for the feedback and suggestions! We are ready to make any
> > further
> > changes needed. Is there anything else we can address for this patch?
>
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:31 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro and Andrew,
>
> Top posting only for visibility. Would it make more sense to have this
> land via the Kbuild tree or -mm? The core of the series really touches
> Kbuild and I think the x86 stuff can just land with Acks, unle
Hi Masahiro and Andrew,
Top posting only for visibility. Would it make more sense to have this
land via the Kbuild tree or -mm? The core of the series really touches
Kbuild and I think the x86 stuff can just land with Acks, unless the
-tip folks feel differently. I would like Rong to have a relati
Hi Rong,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:20:02PM -0700, Rong Xu wrote:
> Thanks to all for the feedback and suggestions! We are ready to make any
> further
> changes needed. Is there anything else we can address for this patch?
I will reply in a separate thread for visibility but I think one of the
b
On 10/18/24 11:20 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
Thanks to all for the feedback and suggestions! We are ready to make any further
changes needed. Is there anything else we can address for this patch?
Also, we know it's not easy to test this patch, but if anyone has had a chance
to try building AutoFDO/Pro
Thanks to all for the feedback and suggestions! We are ready to make any further
changes needed. Is there anything else we can address for this patch?
Also, we know it's not easy to test this patch, but if anyone has had a chance
to try building AutoFDO/Propeller kernels with it, we'd really appre
