On 二, 2018-03-20 at 09:38 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-03-18, 13:44, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > I got those warnings as well, and I quietly ignored them :)
> >
> > I ignored the renaming part for the sake of consistency. The other
> > existing
> > routines for similar purpose are named as:
On 14-03-18, 13:44, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I got those warnings as well, and I quietly ignored them :)
>
> I ignored the renaming part for the sake of consistency. The other existing
> routines for similar purpose are named as:
>
> thermal_cooling_device_type_show
> thermal_cooling_device_max_stat
On 14-03-18, 16:01, Zhang Rui wrote:
> WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol
> fully
> #147: FILE: drivers/thermal/Kconfig:18:
> +config THERMAL_STATISTICS
>
> WARNING: Consider renaming function(s)
> 'thermal_cooling_device_total_trans_show' to 'total_trans_show'
> #3
On 二, 2018-03-13 at 15:02 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Viresh,
>
> I will queue it for 4.17, with just one minor fix below.
>
I got the following warning from checkpatch.pl
---
WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol
fully
#147: FILE: drivers/thermal/Kconf
On 13-03-18, 15:02, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Viresh,
>
> I will queue it for 4.17, with just one minor fix below.
>
> On 二, 2018-01-16 at 15:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > + cdev->stats = stats;
> > + stats->last_time = ktime_get();
> > + stats->max_states = states;
> > + cdev->stats =
Hi, Viresh,
I will queue it for 4.17, with just one minor fix below.
On 二, 2018-01-16 at 15:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This extends the sysfs interface for thermal cooling devices and
> exposes
> some pretty useful statistics. These statistics have proven to be
> quite
> useful specially whi
On 16-01-18, 15:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This extends the sysfs interface for thermal cooling devices and exposes
> some pretty useful statistics. These statistics have proven to be quite
> useful specially while doing benchmarks related to the task scheduler,
> where we want to make sure that not