@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-Maintainer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/27] staging: unisys: visorinput: remove
> unnecessary locking
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2016, David Kershner wrote:
> > + /*
> > +* If we're not paused, really enable inter
nder, David Anthony; dan.j.willi...@intel.com;
> > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-
> > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-Maintainer
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/27] staging: unisys: visorinput: remove
> > unnecessary locking
> >
@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-Maintainer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/27] staging: unisys: visorinput: remove
> unnecessary locking
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +, Sell, Timothy C wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Neil
David Anthony;
> > dan.j.willi...@intel.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > d...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-de...@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-
> > Maintainer
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/27] staging: unisys: visorinput: remove
> > unnecessary locking
>
...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-de...@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-
> Maintainer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/27] staging: unisys: visorinput: remove
> unnecessary locking
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26:36PM -0400, David Kershner wrote:
> > From: Tim Sell
> >
> > Locking in the _i
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26:36PM -0400, David Kershner wrote:
> From: Tim Sell
>
> Locking in the _interrupt() function is NOT necessary so long as we ensure
> that interrupts have been stopped whenever we need to pause or resume the
> device, which we now do.
>
> While a device is paused, we
On Tue, 31 May 2016, David Kershner wrote:
> + /*
> + * If we're not paused, really enable interrupts.
> + * Regardless of whether we are paused, set a flag indicating
> + * interrupts should be enabled so when we resume, interrupts
> + * will really be enabled.
> + */
