Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-12 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 03:38:48 - "James Johnston" wrote: > My mail client is determined to embarrass me. :( Trying again... Worked this time! Applied to the docs tree, thanks. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-10 Thread David Howells
Reviewed-by: David Howells -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
> > > Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented > > > in kernel/module.c:273. > > > > So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it's been white-space > > mangled. Care to fix your mail client and resend? > > > > Thanks, > > > > jon > > Sorry about that. I ass

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
> > Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented > > in kernel/module.c:273. > > So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it's been white-space > mangled. Care to fix your mail client and resend? > > Thanks, > > jon Sorry about that. I assume you are talking

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:45:17 - "James Johnston" wrote: > Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented in > kernel/module.c:273. So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it's been white-space mangled. Care to fix your mail client and resend? Thanks, jon --

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-07 Thread James Johnston
David Howells wrote: > James Johnston wrote: > > > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is > > supplied on > > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is > > +supplied > > You're definitely right about the change from enforcemodulesig to > sig_enf

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-07 Thread David Howells
James Johnston wrote: > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is supplied on > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is supplied You're definitely right about the change from enforcemodulesig to sig_enforce, but how does the "module." come about?